As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There is no current proof that advancing technology will deteriorate the ability of humans to think. On the contrary, advancements in technology has advanced our vast knowledge in many fields, opening opportunities for further understanding and achievement. For example, the problem of debilitating illnesses and diseases such as Alzheimer's disease is slowing being solved by the technological advancements in stem cell research. The future ability of growing new brain cells and the possibility to reverse the onset of Alzheimer's is now becoming a reality. this shows our initiative as humans to better our health demonstrates greater ability of humans to think. One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds is the use of internet and cell phones. In the past humans had to seek out information in many different environments and aspects of life. now humans can sit in a chair and type anything in a computer and get an answer. our reliance on this type of technology can be detrimental if not regulated and regularly substituted for other information sources such as human interaction and hands on learning. I think if humans understand that we should not have such a reliance on computer technology, then we as a species will advance further by utilizing the opportunity of computer technology as well as the other sources of information outside of a computer. Supplementing our knowledge with internet access is surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Mridul | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | chrissyready | 66 | view |
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's rec 77
- 1.The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire vill 50
- tpo 6Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 70
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 58
- TPO-18: students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 559, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...f Alzheimers is now becoming a reality. this shows our initiative as humans to bette...
^^^^
Line 1, column 853, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t humans had to seek out information in many different environments and aspects of life. now h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 902, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Now
...erent environments and aspects of life. now humans can sit in a chair and type anyt...
^^^
Line 1, column 983, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Our
...ything in a computer and get an answer. our reliance on this type of technology can...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, i think, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 252.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19444444444 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15362862744 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551587301587 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6594839022 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17890385145 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760012583071 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474897907309 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17890385145 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.