Technology kills the ability of humans to think and solve their own problems. Why? Because humans simply don't know how to properly harness the pool of resources given by technology. It's the tendency of humans that they have decided to live a stupid, sedentary living lifestyles. We, the humans as of today think of the equation in our mind that "technology = problem solver". That logic is just plain wrong.
For example, big monopolistic companies gave birth to smart phones with features like slim body, turbo charging, instant messaging, blah, blah, blah. Where smart phones have become a tight glue on the palm of the hands and where sedentary a living guy or girl can do stuff like watching movies, email, video calling, etc. And let's not forget the video games. Yes, video games, a great time killer for fun and also a killer of thinking ability of the human species.
Then comes the internet, where people simply cannot live without it. Where there are plethora of apps which gives access to the internet and internet has millions of websites like music, videos, blogs, tutorials, social media. While social media is not really social. It's more of a show off stuff media website where young stupid people and celebrities just randomly post garbage for number of likes and hearts or dislikes. After all, it's the tendency of the human to look for entertainment.
With the evidences given above, technology did play some good role as well. Like in medical sector where in early 20th century it helped drastically reduce the small pox disease. Doing complex calculations in seconds. Simulators like flight or car simulators where pilots or drivers are trained properly before actual flying and driving. Sending rockets and satellites in space and catch, collect and send data and study the atmosphere of planets. For example, Voyager 1 and 2 sent outside of solar system where currently, its impossible for humans to travel. Great talented artists can now share their artwork on the internet.
Everything has its good and bad side effects. In this case, technology has helped us to cross the impossible line. But it has also made us stupid and lazy enough that we are having a hard time for finding imaginations and creativity and this is also bad for the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hink and solve their own problems. Why? Because humans simply dont know how to properly...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...wn problems. Why? Because humans simply dont know how to properly harness the pool o...
^^^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... pool of resources given by technology. Its the tendency of humans that they have d...
^^^
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... movies, email, video calling, etc. And lets not forget the video games. Yes, video ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 228, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...videos, blogs, tutorials, social media. While social media is not really social. Its ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 436, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ikes and hearts or dislikes. After all, its the tendency of the human to look for e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, really, second, so, then, well, while, after all, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97911227154 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4940018648 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610966057441 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3178734529 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4583333333 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9583333333 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137702684389 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361511684279 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475215534185 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063947293922 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033730763034 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.