According to the given statement that people will loose the ability to think for themselves as they rely more and more on technology to solve problems, I disagree with the statement to great extent. To support my argumrnt various reasons are provided in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firslty, technology is the product of imagination and advanced thinking ability. Humans acquired knowledge and invented various technical gadgets and machine. All these machinery and high level equipement are possible because of thinking ability. Technology serves to ease the problems of human beings but it does not mean that it deteriote the thinking ability for themselves. Infact, it demands more thinking ability as these advancement also bring and create new problems which needed to be addressed and solved.For example, vehicles are a technological advancement but the pollution caused by it has made necessary for humans to overcome the pollution. Therefore, air purifiers and CNG are being used to tackle this problem. Hence, technology advancement is an ongoing process of thinking ability to overcome the day to day issues.
Moreover, it can be said that the technology is easing the process of problem solving and humans rely on it. But the major reason of relying on technology is that is saves time and is much efficient. Whether it is an engineering field or health sector these technologies are contributing in every way to achieve and progress more and more. Earlier in health sector, it wasn't possbile to do a lacroscopic surgery but humans invented a device which made it possible. So, it wouldn't have been possible without the ability of thinking for themselves or others.
On the contrary, these technologies may make people lazy and lethargic. As every coin has two sides, more reliance or overdependence on anything would result in a deterioting way. For instance, if students would rely more on using the calculator there might be chances that they wouldn't thrive in a better way incomparison to the previous generation. To much dependence will also stop them from thinking of alternative ways as they would get so used to of the technology. Hence, excess of dependence would result in a negative way.
In the conclusion, i can say that the technology does enable to think more and more to tackle the existing and new problems which may be due to technology itself. However, new generation may get too much used to of it and maybe not able to think effeciently.
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 62
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 55
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...to the given statement that people will loose the ability to think for themselves as ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this machinery' or 'these machineries'?
Suggestion: this machinery; these machineries
...ious technical gadgets and machine. All these machinery and high level equipement are possible ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this advancement' or 'these advancements'?
Suggestion: this advancement; these advancements
...ct, it demands more thinking ability as these advancement also bring and create new problems whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...which needed to be addressed and solved.For example, vehicles are a technological a...
^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... and more. Earlier in health sector, it wasnt possbile to do a lacroscopic surgery bu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...a device which made it possible. So, it wouldnt have been possible without the ability ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ulator there might be chances that they wouldnt thrive in a better way incomparison to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: Too
...ncomparison to the previous generation. To much dependence will also stop them fro...
^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ence, excess of dependence would result in a negative way. In the conclusion, i can say that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...n a negative way. In the conclusion, i can say that the technology does enable...
^
Line 9, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay be due to technology itself. However, new generation may get too much used to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09582309582 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86626581446 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501228501229 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2039378351 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7619047619 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90476190476 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324011353336 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911767607264 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098815547606 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204421948394 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961942937924 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.