As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Nowadays innovations of technology tend to replace all human work. Consequently, it may lead to the degradation or capacity to think of mankind. As it was quoted by Sydney Harris, the real danger is not that computers will begin to think like men, but that men will begin to think like computers. However, I strongly disagree with the statement that computers can inhibit people`s evolution or what how contribute capability of human being to think for themselves. Moreover, technology progress impact positively on further development and investigation in science.
Firstly, technologies that replace human work are mostly directed to ease rough labor. Hence, it is obvious that machinery still need human participation to fulfill certain assignment. For example, today, even the most innovative engineering plant that is bombarded with advanced technology need people who manage and administer with all stages of engineering. Machinery here, can implement the welding work, transportation of heavy details or polish the cars, however the most significant role conjugating the usage of mental abilities is still belongs to men. Furthermore, development of modern technologies has not obtained the level when computers will be able to think, analyze and set the relevant decision on sudden occurred problem as a human can.
Secondly, new technologies can be a base for future development. Today, having an opportunity to send various spacecrafts to the far planets, people have a great chance to investigate the possibility of life on other solar systems. Who knows, maybe human being will have some signs of alternative extant life somewhere on other planet. Consequently, people will have alternative ways to survive if the Earth will be transformed into a boiling pot someday because of global warming problem. So, innovations can effectively stimulate people to develop and open new doors for science.
Furthermore, recent technology evolution facilitates people to be engaged more in science and self-development. Likewise, mankind is now less encumbered with routine and mechanical work at home and office because of great help of new machines and computers. For instance, nowadays, lots of housewives can greatly economize their time for cooking or cleaning, thus, having a chance to pursue their education. Consequently, people all over the World have excellent facilities to extend their knowledge and broad their outlook by distant education or self education by Internet.
To sum up, recent technology boom may not only tremendously ease people`s lives or make free from daily routine but also contribute to future grandiose discoveries and evolution of mankind as no one computer has not been able to substitute complicated human brain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- If you were an employer which kind of worker would you prefer to hire an experienced worker at a higher salary or inexperienced worker at a lower salary 87
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children)To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- We believe that improved customer service is the best way for us to differentiate ourselves from competitors and attract new customers We can offer our customers better service by reducing waiting time in teller lines from an average of six minutes to an 63
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 16
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 80
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'likewise', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261954261954 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.143451143451 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.108108108108 0.0880659088768 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0748440748441 0.0497285424764 151% => OK
Pronouns: 0.018711018711 0.0444667217837 42% => OK
Prepositions: 0.10395010395 0.12292977631 85% => OK
Participles: 0.027027027027 0.0406280797675 67% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.08244274678 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.043659043659 0.030933414821 141% => OK
Particles: 0.002079002079 0.0016655270985 125% => OK
Determiners: 0.0519750519751 0.0997080785238 52% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.029106029106 0.0249443105267 117% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.012474012474 0.0148568991511 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2772.0 2732.02544248 101% => OK
No of words: 425.0 452.878318584 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.52235294118 6.0361032391 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.414117647059 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.327058823529 0.280924506359 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.249411764706 0.200843997647 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.197647058824 0.132149295362 150% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08244274678 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 219.290929204 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583529411765 0.48968727796 119% => OK
Word variations: 70.9809585759 55.4138127331 128% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.25 23.380412469 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.77767376 59.4972553346 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.6 141.124799967 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 23.380412469 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.05 0.674092028746 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 53.9558823529 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.65789473684 1.64882698954 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413918521875 0.391690518653 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102341856606 0.123202303941 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0709205061379 0.077325440228 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.483905614099 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166078267321 0.149214159877 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139534488099 0.161403998019 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585319674797 0.0892212321368 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.293267511933 0.385218514788 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0906372900033 0.0692045440612 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252737426237 0.275328986314 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497320371153 0.0653680567796 76% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.