A risky action can range from a situation that does not have much foreseeable negative consequences to one that has a high chance of having harmful consequences if taken. In order to evaluate the statement, it would be of paramount importance to consider the scenario in which this statement is being applied. While at first, it appears like risky actions should always carefully deliberated since it would be the rational way to decide upon the next move, one cannot repudiate the events where risky actions have changed the course of history and have resulted in better consequences than if one had not taken it.
In the period of world war II,weapons built on newly discovered power of nuclear energy were at large. For the purpose of winning the war, USA decided to use these weapons of mass destruction on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While it ended the war, it could be categorized a pyrrhic victory at the cost of humanity because, even to this day, the cities that were bombed are facing deleterious effects of a risky decision that was taken decades ago. Had USA carefully considered the consequences of what the decision might lead to from a humanitarian angle, it probably would have not gone ahead with the bombing and thus would have averted these negative consequences. Perhaps careful evaluation and discussion from all perspectives might have led to a better solution with less negative impact.
While the risky actions taken without considering all foreseeable consequences can have a negative impact, it is not always the case. There are instances where risky actions can be a trump card that can be a propitious move for the decider. In the 20-20 cricket World Cup finals of 2011 the first in such format, the match was a close competition between teams that were in complete form. In the last over, Pakistan needed a meager amount of 11 runs to win it; it had built a wonderful innings and could have acheived this target but it had only one wicket left which made the match a fair one for both the teams. The Indian Captain decided to give this death over to Joginder Sharma who was not expected to bowl this important over was a risky action taken by the indian captain. But, the way he bowled the over and the field setting got India the championship. This risky action was later shown as a strategic move that won india the championship.
Risky actions should be taken after considering the consequences that it can lead to, but is not applicable in all situations as in some situations risky actions can get better results than ones decided after careful evaluation of pros and cons.
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch foreseeable negative consequences to one that has a high chance of having har...
^^
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , weapons
...taken it. In the period of world war II,weapons built on newly discovered power of nucl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79333333333 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60564344794 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506666666667 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.3406719165 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.8125 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9375 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169495646913 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577363071858 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414507721223 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115909943 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186763337586 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.