People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Each individual differs in how one perceives the results of their efforts should be; some people want perfection in their work while some just compromise with mediocrity. The choice is completely subjective. The prompt suggests that people who are most devoted towards an idea or policy are also the ones that are most critical of it. I mostly agree with the prompt and will elucidate my position with three reasons.
The person that foment the idea or a policy think very thoroughly, the need for such an idea or a policy, and what problem it is solving. He is the best person to decide how this particular idea or policy should be implemented and hence, is most critical of it, as the consequences of his work can affect others considerably. For example, Mahatma Gandhi uses the idea of non-violence in their protest against the Britishers, as a means to show their protest. With that notion, he started a Non-Cooperation movement, with the aim of gaining India the independence. The movement was successful in attracting masses, and millions join the movement and protest peacefully. When the movement was its peak, a violent incident broke out in a village where the protestors turn to violent means and burn down the police station. Outraged and shocked by the violent incident, he immediately withdrawal the movement as it was against the very idea that started the movement in the first place i.e., non-violence.
Moreover, some people take their job as their passion and want everything to be perfect. And for being perfect, you have to be your biggest critic. For example, the movie The Titanic’s director James Cameron was suggested by an astronomer that the positions of the stars in the final scenes of the movie were incorrect. To anyone else, this doesn’t make any difference. But James Cameron, while making the 3D version of the movie, takes the extra effort to make sure that in the final cut of the 3D version, the star position should be exactly as it should be astronomically. This is called perfection, and only those who take the responsibility of their work can do such acts.
However, for some people, the end result of an idea or a policy may be different, it could be related to money. Like, if someone wants to make a movie for just the commercial aspect of it and does not care about the script, acting, etc. He may use the same old successfully tested formulae for it, is not really critical about his work. For such people, the objective is different, and therefore, they are not critical of their work.
In conclusion, one’s evaluation of their work is totally dependent on the individual; therefore, some could be the biggest critic of their work while some maybe not. The individual reaction is highly subjective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | jha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | NobodyUp | 66 | view |
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 73
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 518, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that in the final cut of the 3D version, the star position should be exactly as i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2680.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 545.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91743119266 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74515526909 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477064220183 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 831.6 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1903861766 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.076923077 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9615384615 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96153846154 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382561571223 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10299049352 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148042435635 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21279483428 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170016438494 0.0667264976115 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.