Criticizing a plan or policy may be much easier than doing that job. Critics could see an issue in idealistic views and attack the disadvantages. The prompt claims that people who are devoted to planning or implementing a project or idea are less likely to have a critical view on that. This prompt is intricate and has various views that should be considered. However, I mostly agree with this prompt and I explain my reasons.
First of all, the people, who are involved in planning a policy, could reflect their ideas in the policy. They can criticize the policy before publicly propagate. Thus, they could show their ideas and change the policy as much as possible and it means the policy is aligned with their thoughts to some extent. For instance, Obama's cabinet members, the former president of the United States, were involved in the Obama health care program. This program was established by different experts that reflect the cabinet's members and was approved after months of evaluation. Therefore, the program mostly reflects the cabinet's ideas and they have rarely, even any, critical views on this program, even after more than four years.
Moreover, when people are involved in a project, they would be aware of the difficulties and limitations of the implementation of the project. They distance from idealistic views and face realistic ones. Thus, before they censure the project, they would consider the circumstances of the project. For example, project staffs of a bridge on a Karon river, in Iran, are aware of the environmental, economic, and social issues of the projects. So, they may rarely have critical ideas about a pause in the project because they know payment by the government had delay for several months that affects the time schedule of the project.
On the other hand, some may claim since bodies who are committed to the project are vigilant of the detail of the project, so they know the defects of it properly and understand what changes could improve it. For instance, the designers and constructors of the projects, as were involved in the project, can provide some suggestions that improve the performance of the project. Or on the contrary, they know the weak points of the project that can mention.
In conclusion, this prompt presents a complicated subject that we can investigate from several views. Although some may reckon the people who are involved in an idea or project could have more critical views on it, they are more likely to support them due to awareness of limitations and difficulties of implementation of a project or policy.
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 66
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position y 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 62
- Many people think that money is the best gift to give a teenager but others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion including relevant examples 56
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9792147806 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68187508234 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466512702079 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2203760221 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95238095238 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114195177276 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410776851391 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397371913861 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726179721587 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414956749092 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.