Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The art funding has always been a controversial issue. Some believe governments should support art financially to ensure flurishing, while others claim governments' funding would destroy the are rather to thrive. Although both camps have their reasons that looks cogent at first glance, I mostly agree with former group and I will explain my reasons now.
First of all, the art is one of the vulnerable types of industries and should be preserved carefully. Young artists should be supported financially for several years to achieve to the levels that could provide cost of their lives. Thus, the govenmental funding could play critica role in flourishing artists. For instance, the government can provide scholarship for art universities and students could freely study in their favourite programs. Or the governments could buy the works of unknown painters to support them and in the future by becoming famous these artist, the governments could earn more money by selling them in hihger prices.
Moreover, the artistic activities are costly and private organizations and compaies are rarely like to do activities in these areas. So, government by supporting art activities in schools could find and thrive talent of students. Consequently, the art help student to enhance their imaginations and creativities. Therefore, even if these students would not work in the art industries, they have good creativity that could use in their lives. For example, an engineer with good artistic background could present most creative solutions in her career in campare with others that lack this ability.
On the other hand, some maintain that some government could guide artists path in special line that is appropriate for the government. They exemplify dictatorship government like North Korea. In this country, government funding just accquire to the artists that praise the governor. Therefore, young artists that need funding should acclaim the government and this lead to integrity of the art in that country. I could not deny this idea, however, it is an exception and it should not be generalized for the whole world.
In conclusion, although we can find some expception that the government take advantages of artirst and assign fund just to its supportes, I reckon the government funding is crucial for flurishing especially for young artists.
- The powerful aremost respected not when they exercise their power butwhen they refrain from exercising it Write an essay in which you develop and support a position on the statement above In writing your essay you should consider both when the statement m 50
- Many people think that money is the best gift to give a teenager but others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion including relevant examples 78
- It is more harmful to compromise one s own beliefs than to adhere to them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 62
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...claim governments funding would destroy the are rather to thrive. Although both camps h...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 556, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this artist' or 'these artists'?
Suggestion: this artist; these artists
...em and in the future by becoming famous these artist, the governments could earn more money ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32614555256 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8143750223 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541778975741 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3716572808 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30995320616 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109469189507 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882659886932 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188342719191 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533642122058 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.