People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

The decision making process is complex and differs from one person to another. There are inumerous factors one must take into account in order to make an appropriate decision. Some people prefer to step away from their own emotions when making a judgement, sticking to their logical ideas. Others put their hearts first, letting their emotions make their decisions instead. Commonly, these last group find a logical way to explain their decision process after their actions took place. That is, with no doubts, a signal that they are poor decision makers.
First of all, deciding with logical requires a person to take into account all the given factors. This is essential in order to make a correct decision, because once something important is not considered, of course the consequences will be different than as the person's first predictions. For example, when a high school graduate is choosing what to study in college, several key factors must be in one's mind - such as courses avaliability, career oportunities, personal skills and last, but not least, the student's liking for the subjects to be taken. When all of that is taken into consideration, the decision is more logical, and therefore, more likely to cause positive effects.
It is clear in the afforementioned example that the emotions must not be completely forgotten when deciding something. However, deciding with emotions often fail to take into account key factors that can mine the process, leading to unpredictable consequences. The same student from the previous case may have a passion for music, for example. But if he fails to think about the possible jobs he will get as a musician in the place he lives, he may become a professionaly frustrated person.
Moreover, when a decision is made with logic, it is possible to to foresee problems that haven't still taken place, something that would be impossible when you think only about the emotions. If the student who dreams of becoming a musician finds a good college to study music, but also think about difficulties to get a job in his hometown after graduating, he may study music and move somewhere else. This is a logical decision, that takes into account not only his emotions, but also the way of solving a problem that is lekely to occur.
In other words, in spite of the fact that emotions are important when making a decision, it must be considered as one of the factors to be taken into account in the process. A good decision maker is able to understand his/her own emotions, combine that with all the other key factors available, foresee the consequences, and only then, take the first step on the action.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-28 AC1990 58 view
2019-11-06 july123 50 view
2019-10-14 Aryankanwar01 66 view
2019-10-12 ritvii 50 view
2019-10-08 dipalip 33 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user felipeflaminio :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...urse the consequences will be different than as the persons first predictions. For e...
^^^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...sion is made with logic, it is possible to to foresee problems that havent still take...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...is possible to to foresee problems that havent still taken place, something that would...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, for example, no doubt, of course, such as, first of all, in other words, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92617449664 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68130812577 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498881431767 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5950565606 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.894736842 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5263157895 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223262129904 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795963249792 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736825250231 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12457723148 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896849075264 0.0667264976115 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.