There are some people who make decisions based on their emotions and after a while, they regret; because they justify them rationally. As the passage said, I totally disagree with this idea and I will elaborate the faults below.
Firstly, people cannot avoid their emotion because emotion is an unavoidable part of every human being. Also, sometimes a person puts in a specific situation that needs to make a fast decision and this time emotions are precedented logic. For example, when you see a cat in trouble and needs help, you decide to help it by yourself rather than to call the emergency because this scene is so emotionally touching. Although if you call the emergency, it would be better for the cat you should not regret yourself and it does not mean you are a poor decision maker.
Furthermore, there are some persons who always try to make a decision based on logic rather than emotions, but they do not succeed. People need to be emotional in some specific situations rather than to be logical because decisions based on logic cannot make the best result. When a person is in a relationship with someone, and there are some problems between, the logical decision is that to leave each other; however, it is a poor decision. Alternatively, if they make an emotional-based decision and take care of their relationship they would not regret and everything would be alright.
Therefore, although someone agrees with this sentence I highly dispute it and I believe people should not be judged by how they make a decision; because one situation is different from the other one and even logical decisions may be poor decisions in some way.
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve internet access not on public transportation? 73
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 68
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Tpo51- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eing. Also, sometimes a person puts in a specific situation that needs to make a ...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a poor decision maker. Furthermore, there are some persons who always try to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 283.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85159010601 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64621612185 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505300353357 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8075085193 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.818181818 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335888249324 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141560721378 0.0831039109588 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472554417049 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216670834821 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216065387184 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.