People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Decision making is an impertinent task of each person's life in this voyage of living. The prompt here expounds on the fact that those who make decisions based on emotional circumstances are generally poor decision makers. I strongly agree with the prompt for the following two reasons.
We are generally taught to take decisions after lot of thinking and analysis to have better hold on it and not regret our very own decision later. For example during India's National movement for Independence in 1947 there was an impertinent task of deciding partition of whole nation in two countries namely India and Pakistan as they are know now. This decision was to made with lot of insights and judgement. But it seems freedom fighters were deceived in making decision on their emotional instincts by British commander Mountbatten. This resulted in riots between two communities which is still a major issue in present times. If the decision been taken with logic beforehand instead of emotional factor of dividing the nation into two communities, there would have been peace among two communities.
Emotional decision-making can lead to incorrect results and one can also be duped if you trust too much on the story and not the facts. To illustrate more we can take example of fraudsters who can hoodwink the noble or generous person by making up stories of being in need of money. If decision is made on basis of emotional touching you can easily be duped. Once this is done no matter how you try to prove the decision of helping someone in need it does make your action true but for the sake of losing. This help us understand logic applied after decision-making can sometimes do not hold the water.
We can make decisions to help the charity groups by believing the work they have done for society. But if we don't check the background of the same group there is always possibility of getting deceived and then regret later. As we can analyse from above two examples decision made in emotional scenarios is poor even we try to prove the logic behind it. The prompt does hold true for the examples reasoned above and hence it leads to poor decision-making.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- Technocorporation is our top pick for the investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed a satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with curren 30
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...n making is an impertinent task of each persons life in this voyage of living. The prom...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...s namely India and Pakistan as they are know now. This decision was to made with lot...
^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g up stories of being in need of money. If decision is made on basis of emotional ...
^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...k they have done for society. But if we dont check the background of the same group ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...getting deceived and then regret later. As we can analyse from above two examples ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, then, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82210242588 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65723904611 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539083557951 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4600237703 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3888888889 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346449494683 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117839211134 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679445648815 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223048837378 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059399150556 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.