People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The topic of people who makes decisions based on emotion and instantaneous feeling and verify with their own logic are poor decision-maker or not is debatable. In my view, making decisions with influencing certain events is childish, but if the reason is strong that it could be good for the future, then it might be a sagacious decision. If the decision is to help the people, it would be best but if the decision could impede our own life or plan, it will be innocuous.
First, human beings are the intelligent form of development in earth history. All of this, could possible if people could help each other and live in society. There might be many problems and events of happiness and we all need to take part in it. Sometimes, we need to make a decision instantly, there might be no time to think. For example, there could be an accident of a neighbor, and there might be no-one to take care of her/him. In that situation, taking that person to the hospital is our sanity. We see the problems and feel that pain, without thinking anything we need to take them to the medical center. If the problems are related to life or death, there always come of emotion first. So in this case, the people who decide according to emotions are the strongest decision-makers.
On the other hand, we all have many problems in life. Sometimes, in emotion, we could promise some impossible things than it might cause our life problematic. As an instance, we might be suffering from pecuniary problems. At the same time, there might be someone in our neighbor admitted in hospital and need money in urgency. Looking at their situation, we might feel bad and could promise him/her to lend the money. After all, it could hinder our monthly expenditures. We might face the problem and could lead to an extreme. In this situation a person's decision is weak.
In conclusion, the weak or strong decision rather depends on the situation and the circumstances, then concluding that it could be based on emotion even with justifying with logic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest f 3
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 43
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest f 78
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n life or plan, it will be innocuous. First, human beings are the intelligent ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns are the strongest decision-makers. On the other hand, we all have many prob...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...situation a persons decision is weak. In conclusion, the weak or strong decisi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, then, after all, for example, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72112676056 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66129956486 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495774647887 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1616682703 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8095238095 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9047619048 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260614110965 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089056500466 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140683166194 0.0758088955206 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217926303812 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14622234241 0.0667264976115 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.