Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Politicians play a great role in improving the economy of a nation. Hence, they have to think smart and perform the right task at the right time. The author contends that politicians must follow commonly stated opinions rather than his own belief. In my opinion, I partially disagree with the author for the following reasons.
To begin with, government should provide the highest priority towards the welfare of the society. Hence, politicians should hear problems faced by people and resolve them. For example, In India, two of the major issue faced by women are sexual harassment and rape. As women gathered and protested in front of the Indian high court, government announced a law to hang people who are involved in disturbing women. Therefore, politicians should consider problems faced by every citizen and provide a righteous solution.
However, there are also people in the society who are in common ground for opposing the good welfare of the nation. The government should not bluntly consider societies problem without proper judgements. For instance, consider a law that is introduced in a nation where, people who drink and drive would be severely punished with fine and jail. Even though the law does well to the society, there will be people who would oppose the law. Maybe they are the people who prefer to drink and drive. Hence, it is important for the politicians to not hastily follow the majority.
Also, there are situations when politician’s belief improved the economy of a nation. For example, Mahatma Gandhi is known as the father of India and as a freedom fighter. He had his own belief that non-violence will win freedom for India whereas there were many people who didn’t believe his words and would try to convince Gandhi to start a war. But he stood alongside his words of non-violence. Thus, politician’s belief and determination can also prove to improve a nation’s economy.
In conclusion, politicians need to have their own passion and goal to produce an improved nation. However, societies views should also be considered while planning future goals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-26 | GRACE_047 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
| 2022-05-23 | _ashmita.upadhyay_ | 66 | view |
| 2022-03-09 | sunshaowei | 83 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | ksmehrab | 66 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct Previous archaeological findings have suggested that early humans generally 55
- The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work the commute now takes 62
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 30
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation rather than competition 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09275362319 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65100314699 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539130434783 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.73849033 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.8636363636 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6818181818 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.59090909091 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101132287724 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342156071333 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281211381836 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585659794065 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239307881049 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.