Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In de

Politics can be a perplexing game played by various individuals which conclusively affects a massive group of people. It is important to comprehend the fundamental importance of objectives set by politicians which thereby affect the civilians of a particular region. Having a pragmatic approach towards achieving goals that would be utmost help towards the society should be of the highest priority. Being idealistic in nature can belie the time and the amount of work involved in bringing these objectives into the real world. I certainly agree that the goals and objectives pursued by politicians should be reasonable rather than unusually elusive in nature.

It is important to understand that we live in a world where people expect changes to be flexible and quick in nature. The only way to ensure the swiftness in productive change in society is to implement practical and reasonable demands which would be accepted by our society and thereby be promptly accomplished by our political kingdom. These small goals and objectives leads to massive societal change which is essentially needed as demanded by the idealistic nature. A good example on how idealistic nature fails to introduce strong productive change can be seen in the government of India, the second most populated country in the world has a diminishing approach of management style.

This is essentially due to elusive ideals followed by the government to merely give the impression of deceiving effort they apply towards the development of country. The program of “swatch bharath” was primarily started has cleaning campaign where the prime minister tried to focus on having a garbage free country turned out to be an advertising campaign. Rather than focusing on spreading maxims which rhyme, the politician could focus on better waste management, better methods of garbage disposal and having an efficient recycling station in the country. Sweeping streets with brooms do bring a ton of publicity and seems idealistic in nature but real change can be retrieved through practical approaches.

One might say bringing idealistic approaches can be a good way of bringing an essence of enthusiasm towards the implementation process, but if the nature of this tedious process is carefully studied, we can see that one might give up on an exhausting and vexing idealistic approach. Politicians must ensure practical tasks which individuals could believe and envision the change occurring, if the idea is too elusive in nature, one must have blind faith to rigorously work towards the task. And it is a known fact that people do not have blind faith in politicians rather they would want reasonable goals that could be achieved with a good sense of guarantee. Great leaders such as Mahathma Gandhi did not depend on idealistic motives but had a realistic approach towards a problem. A good example would be the boycotting of British goods, if Gandhi proceeded to follow idealistic approach of fighting the British through the tools of violence rather than simply inhibit the use of their goods, the independence of the Indian governance would have more bloodshed written in their history.

Small practical goals set up by a politician tend to be a better way of implementing them rather than the idealistic way of retrieving it. If politicians could agree on to realistic approaches, faster and efficient changes would be bolstered by people would believe in them.