To remain vigorous,any academic field needs to be led by truly independent thinkers who are willing to ignore established boundaries and challenge long-standing assumptions.
The statement "To remain vigorous,any academic field needs to be led by truly independent thinkers who are willing to ignore established boundaries and challenge long-standing assumptions" certainly complicated and controversial statement. I partially agree and partially disagree with this statement. I provide enough evidences to advocate my view on this statement.
"Innovation" is one word that can resurgent a field from void to ubiquitous within a certain period. Thinkers who practice such tendency are considered to be as "INNOVATIVE THINKERS". Their contribution brings us a new way of performing a task and also with great efficacy. Historical data provides a large number of examples to emphasize this conclusion. One such case is "Statement of Copernicus",where Copernicus most elite person in the society at that time stated for the first time that Earth is round. He broke the stout walls of conventionality in the field of science which believed that earth is not round but flat. Though he was opposed initially,later people convinced with his statement and still in existence.
Another such case of "Innovation" is discovery of "GRAVITATIONAL FORCE". It was the Apple which fallen from a tree under which Newton was resting made him to illuminate a new concept called "gravitation". It was not the first time an apple has fallen from a tree. And also it was not the first time a person observed an apple falling. But the only variance lies in the innovative way of thinking or novelty in thinking.
It is not all the time being novel brings us victory. Sometimes being conventional also brings us good results. Cases which include mass decision making or mass working mainly demands a conventional way of making things. Allowing novelty in such case leads to incongruity .So to avoid all such confusion conventional approach is implemented in such cases. for example in governments where democracy is prevailing voting is a conventional practice supported and practiced by many people. And also having houses to discuss the welfare of people comes under such case.
As I have provided irrefutable evidences on the statement given, I conclude the statement as partially acceptable one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-07-27 | ravitejathoram | 16 | view |
- unlike great thinkers and great artists the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise 54
- students should be encouraged to realize that the mental agility and rhetorical skill must be accompanied by sincerity and the true conviction of their own beliefs. 58
- two approaches of personality building are compared 80
- In some organizations, promotions are based on seniority, while in other oraganizations, promotions are based on performance 76
- Some people are very organized, while other are not so organized. which type of person are you? 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , any
The statement 'To remain vigorous,any academic field needs to be led by truly...
^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...reat efficacy. Historical data provides a large number of examples to emphasize this conclusion. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , where
...e is 'Statement of Copernicus',where Copernicus most elite person in the soc...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , later
...ut flat. Though he was opposed initially,later people convinced with his statement and...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... It was not the first time an apple has fallen from a tree. And also it was not ...
^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'Sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'being'.
Suggestion: Being Sometimes
...the time being novel brings us victory. Sometimes being conventional also brings us good result...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ovelty in such case leads to incongruity .So to avoid all such confusion conventio...
^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...elty in such case leads to incongruity .So to avoid all such confusion conventiona...
^^
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... approach is implemented in such cases. for example in governments where democracy ...
^^^
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...practice supported and practiced by many people. And also having houses to discus...
^^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... statement as partially acceptable one.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'so', 'still', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269503546099 0.240241500013 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.16548463357 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0921985815603 0.0880659088768 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0425531914894 0.0497285424764 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0401891252955 0.0444667217837 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0945626477541 0.12292977631 77% => OK
Participles: 0.0472813238771 0.0406280797675 116% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.71144848863 2.79330140395 133% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0260047281324 0.030933414821 84% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.080378250591 0.0997080785238 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00236406619385 0.0249443105267 9% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0212765957447 0.0148568991511 143% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2286.0 2732.02544248 84% => OK
No of words: 352.0 452.878318584 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.49431818182 6.0361032391 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.380681818182 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.303977272727 0.280924506359 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.247159090909 0.200843997647 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.181818181818 0.132149295362 138% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.71144848863 2.79330140395 133% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 219.290929204 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565340909091 0.48968727796 115% => OK
Word variations: 63.1715480743 55.4138127331 114% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.380412469 68% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3867862735 59.4972553346 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.909090909 141.124799967 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.380412469 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.272727272727 0.674092028746 40% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.21349557522 211% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 46.3977272727 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.65714285714 1.64882698954 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242783761537 0.391690518653 62% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13227120664 0.123202303941 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.140358038397 0.077325440228 182% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.459621618754 0.547984918172 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176513545734 0.149214159877 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764642594219 0.161403998019 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158509467253 0.0892212321368 178% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.217803152023 0.385218514788 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.128191823796 0.0692045440612 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16371532058 0.275328986314 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.209565334008 0.0653680567796 321% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.