Scandals bring people together.
Be it a political statement or a cinematic drama, the concept of scandals has well percolated the human society as we know today.
Scandals cause many a people to unite with mixed reactions and openly discuss their viewpoints. Needless to say, a societal
impact pressed by the aftermath of scandals cannot be ignored. Not many years ago, it was considered
downright shameful to have been caught in a law infringing activity or partaking in harassment of individuals. Today however, the same vile act of being involved
in one way or the other in a scandal is easily manipulated and taken advantage of to create monetary benefits. Moreover, an inevitable enhancement of social presence-either
of an ideology or group of individuals. If not for the media, perhaps scandals would not have lost the idea of negativity associated with them. Think about the number of times artists
begin creating a flurry of news articles revolving around them for better or worse, just before the release of their projects and works. An instance being that of performer Miley Cyrus,
who indulged in a myriad number of on-stage stunts like the infamous twerking with singer Robin Thick, making international news-just to have the news sway to her music
and projects such as Happy Hippie foundation which she founded in support of LGBTQ community.
On the other hand, political agendas shrewdly incorporate headline causing activities to establish or regenerate their prevalance in public conversations. Many a times
do we hear accusations of political party members having copulated with or married to unknown figures, all of which heats up their popuarity among their voters-affecting
their candidacy. For example, Donald Trump was accused of being in a relationship with an alleged model right before the election day. Or about the many times
he was accused of racism and white supremacy, name calling candidates around him and demeaning Muslims-all of which added to the clouds of tension
related to his possible presidency. Contrary to logical belief, this may have led to a positive impact as we can see today.
Scandals may very well have created business and profitability for certain groups of people but it also raises social awareness. PETA for example, has
many a cringe-worthy, scary or threatening campaigns that aim to promote their fight against animal cruelty. None of which seems to hamper their drive but rather,
cause headlines for the better. It is the need for change and a call for revolution that underwrites all these activities and stunts. Evidently, bringing people together
is a very big part of it.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: ankushgurumaa
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... viewpoints. Needless to say, a societal impact pressed by the aftermath of scand...
^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Think about the number of times artists begin creating a flurry of news articles...
^^^
Line 11, column 160, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...revalance in public conversations. Many a times do we hear accusations of political pa...
^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of which added to the clouds of tension related to his possible presidency. Cont...
^^^
Line 17, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... seems to hamper their drive but rather, cause headlines for the better. It is th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22144522145 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87294500627 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601398601399 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2796814856 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.45 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 19.0 4.97078651685 382% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101894705596 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312783342462 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280928831188 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0332463219249 0.150359130593 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237612854555 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.