Science is meaningless without religion.
Science is the major driving force of the present day world. In fact, studying science behind any arcane events is necessary for deeming it as a fact. The prompt recommends us to consider science meaningless without religion. I mostly disagree with the assertion of designating religion as a major influence for science with two reasons.
First of all, If scientific phenomenons rely on unwarranted religion proofs, the results are often specious. To illustrate, many religions in their preachings advocated that the Earth would reach its end by 2011. The most notorious of all is the "Mayan Calendar", where mayanese saints predicted end of the world by 2011, many critics discarded the theory, but some believed in those predictions. However, the forecasting turned out to be bogus. From this example, we can conclude that the religion doesn't influence science, In fact religion denigrate science.
Moreover, many pundits in religion believe that planets are formed by celestial beings. However, there is no proof of any celestial involvement. For example, In early centuries many scientists conducted several experiments to understand the primary reason for the planetary evolution. Some of the famous studies like Big Bang theory states that planets are formed by an intense gravitational collapse and collision between various asteroids, leading to gradual evolution of planets. One must consider factual information rather than relying on false assumptions without any evidence.
On the contrary, In most of the religions many astrologers predicted that the Solar System consists of 9 planets and their forecast came true after scientists conducted experiments and concluded that the Solar System comprises of 9 planets. This conclusion by the scientists casts a doubt that by chance some part of science is indeed influenced by religion.
In conclusion, based on the above stated examples one can determine a theory as a fact only when a scientific proof is laid. However, history also suggests that some phenomenons are influenced by religion.
- The Gordon Act, which established a wildlife refuge in the Big Dark Swamp, is currently up for reauthorization. The act prohibits the building of roads or cutting of old growth trees in the swamp, though it permits hunting. Many blamed logging activities 59
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 33
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 66
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 50
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...mple, we can conclude that the religion doesnt influence science, In fact religion den...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ary reason for the planetary evolution. Some of the famous studies like Big Bang theory sta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...nts and concluded that the Solar System comprises of 9 planets. This conclusion by the scien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...phenomenons are influenced by religion.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 320.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48125 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93283539216 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.911031958 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4444444444 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306390504601 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951293573078 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129947867934 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15667277973 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126378792726 0.0667264976115 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.