Science is meaningless without religion.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Both Science and Religion are based on an 'F' each. Science is based on 'Facts' whereas Religion stems from 'Faith'. Comparing both and entrusting a dependency on them is not a great idea.
We can take an example of the Stone Age where the Early Men existed. The Early Men had not followed any Religion but were able to discover and invent many useful things based on Science. It is the Necessity that made them discover Fire, invent a wheel, come up with an exchange system called Barter System, and many more. If they had waited for a religion to emerge and then start discovering things, we would not have enjoyed such a technically advanced life now.
An example of Albert Einstein can also be considered. It was that apple that fell on him from a tree, that made him discover one of the greatest creations of God ie, Gravity. Had he waited for his religion to demand such a discovery, we would have remained to wonder ever since on why the apple has fallen to the ground and not gone in the opposite direction.
Necessity is the mother of Invention and this invention is indirectly linked to Science. No Religion comes into play in this regard. Stating Science is meaningless without religion is not appropriate. Of course, there might be many cons of the development of science but the amount of pros it offers overrides the cons it does. Hence Science and Religion are two separate fields and no dependency can be created on them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 50
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 67
- The regional brand manager sent the following memo to the national brand manager for Sun Beem Facial Cleanser We need to institute a huge publicity campaign for the launch of Sun Beem s improved formula Without an enormous media blitz including television 59
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Science is meaningless without religion Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...s it offers overrides the cons it does. Hence Science and Religion are two separate f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, whereas, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 2235.4752809 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 256.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62890625 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47193413626 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55859375 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7231530582 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848017652434 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338720956809 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366184308831 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524663144245 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249669349939 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 14.1392134831 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 100.480337079 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.