Scientific fields of study require more critical thinking and research than other fields of study.
The given statement might be partially true, however whether all the scientific fields of research require analytical ability and critical observation as well as more deductive skills is a question that needs further justification. When someone says scientific field, which fields is he/she referring to and what are the criteria for comparison also needs to be justified.
In agreement with the issue, yes, it is true that scientific study requires strong theoretical basis correlated with practical experimentation and data analysis, however, there are many other fields which require critical thinking as well. Now, the basis of scientific research is supposedly for applications which more than ninety percent, if not hundred percent accurate mathematical basis. Hence, since equations need to be solved, the percentage error in scientific research can only be extremely small. But, there are many other fields which also need a high degree of accuracy with respect to data, and hence the statement that almost all fields of research need more critical thinking might not always be true.
On the other hand, it is true that many business and arts topics are often based on qualitative rather than quantitative data. Qualitative data does not need a high degree of accuracy and hence does not require a great depth of knowledge or research. Furthermore, most theories in business and arts are often just for the sake of understanding rather than real life applications. Hence, it might be fair to say that these kinds of research require less analytical ability.
Having argued both side, its fair to say that depending on the specific subject and the research requirement, the level of critical thinking and the depth of research may vary. However, in general, most topics related to science needs mathematical accuracy that is not a necessity for most other fields.
Therefore, although I partially agree with the given topic statement, however I think that almost in all fields, we must utilize human thinking capacity to carry out high quality research so that all these knowledge is applicable in real life and improves human civilizations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-29 | tahmeed1993 | 37 | view |
- It s not possible for someone to effectively care for others unless they are taking good care of themselves 60
- Write about what you did during the winter vacation
- The graph and bar chart below show the average monthly rainfall and temperature for one region of East Africa 67
- Although online news on the market is becoming quite popular, newspapers will still remain as the main source of accurate news. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Many believe that individuals can do little to improve the environment Only governments and large companies can make a real difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'refers'.
Suggestion: refers
...cientific field, which fields is he/she referring to and what are the criteria for compar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... which more than ninety percent, if not hundred percent accurate mathematical basis. He...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...y out high quality research so that all these knowledge is applicable in real life and improves...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, i think, in general, as well as, it is true, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30029154519 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79364801402 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504373177843 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8396263243 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.846153846 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 5.21951772744 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39002411748 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133205823923 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888699198154 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20084101094 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122937424681 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.