“Scientific theories, which most people consider as ‘fact,’
almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should
look upon any information described as ‘factual’ with
skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future.”
Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement
above. In developing and supporting your viewpoint, consider
ways in which the statement might or might not hold true.
The argument above assert that the scientific theories should not be trusted as in recent future the theory might be proven false. Though it is true that in many cases scientific theories later have been proven wrong but there are also credible theories upon which the world is still running. Whenever we are using any theories, it is always good to know the background, scope and limitation of the theories but to reach the extreme position of not using the theories and looking down with skepticism might cause unnecessary time allocation to extraneous things and remain other task unfinished which will depend upon those theories.
Whenever a scientific theory is derived if it proof checked several times by many researchers and also in the first place the researchers or scientists working on that theory have lend several evidence and related derivation to prove their hypothesis. So, for once in a while case, there is no point in looking down at the work of the people with skepticism. These theories of the very researchers are used in making several other derivations, though it is true if the first derivations are based on false assumptions then other theories based on these derivation will not hold true. Having said that, this very fact by default becomes the proof check of its mother theory. Take newtons law of motion for example, almost all other theories of physics is based on the newtons law of motion, if his theory would not hold true then none of the other theories will, and by looking down with skepticism on newton's theory might take the world more backwards than accepting the theory and working further on it did.
Besides looking down at theory with skepticism will deter ourselves from accomplishing our objective where we might need to use that theory. Now the question might rise if the theory itself is wrong then whatever finding we get for our study using that theory will be baseless. But we must keep in mind that this working with the theory further will lead to new invention either of new one or amendment of existing one.
It is true that that some theories proves wrong after sometime, for example the initial thought of the earth's being flat or the atomic structure. But those theories were an inception point of prosperity. We came to know about the theory being not right by working on it further. There is scope for amendment in every single thoughts and theories in the world, but to do that we need to first accept it and work on it with due diligence. But if we look at scientific theory and thinking about it not being true then we will always look for finding the flaws in it which will lead to no new inventions.
To sum up, scientific theories might not be proven right all the time but it should be remembered that it was done with proper research and evidence and the way to go about it even if at the end the theory is found false is to accept the theory and work on it further. If we keep looking at finding clues to make it appear false then we will loose track of out own work and the world will face a slow growth altogether.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'lent'.
Suggestion: lent
... scientists working on that theory have lend several evidence and related derivation...
^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some evidence'.
Suggestion: some evidence
...ntists working on that theory have lend several evidence and related derivation to prove their h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this derivation' or 'these derivations'?
Suggestion: this derivation; these derivations
...ssumptions then other theories based on these derivation will not hold true. Having said that, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 768, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'newtons'' or 'newton's'?
Suggestion: newtons'; newton's
...her theories of physics is based on the newtons law of motion, if his theory would not ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 902, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'newtons'' or 'newton's'?
Suggestion: newtons'; newton's
... and by looking down with skepticism on newtons theory might take the world more backwa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ng with the theory further will lead to new invention either of new one or amendment of exist...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 12, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...amendment of existing one. It is true that that some theories proves wrong after someti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 343, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...es to make it appear false then we will loose track of out own work and the world wil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, so, still, then, while, for example, in many cases, it is true, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2552.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.385246665 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425454545455 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3508384049 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.777777778 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5555555556 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242726724774 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928351844174 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537636858597 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16071701963 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492919870135 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.