Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations or reading.
I agree to the point that employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their
work performance.
A lot of people face the problem in their respective working places with the seniority. According to
me, every one should be graded and placed based on their knowledge and their earlier
experience. In this way the organization in which they are working can see the growth that they are
expecting. The people with past good experience can share their good knowledge with their fellow
members working in the same organization and the people with the past bad experiences can share
the right path to be taken and they can give good suggestions to their fellow members who are
going through the same situations like them. On the other side there are less chances that the
people with less experience can succeed in their life. They may not be able to uplift the organization
with their work.
The fair way to give salary is solely based on the work performance. The salaries should be given
according to their work performance. And with the work performance and continuation in the same
field for long time gives the seniority.
Most of the companies which are hiring the people today, look for the earlier work experience that
they have. When compared to fresher and having experience candidates they would always go for
the experienced candidates because they can use their experience in the present company and
they can also be benefited with their productiveness.
The seniority and the work experience of an individual can bring the highest productivity to their
organization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-24 | Sruthi Bheemineni | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Shrija Sheth | 83 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | fresky | 40 | view |
| 2019-03-18 | Rakshick Shrinivas | 50 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | abyz123 | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Work
...n raises solely on the basis of their work performance. A lot of people face ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Experience
... on their knowledge and their earlier experience. In this way the organization in which ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Expecting
...king can see the growth that they are expecting. The people with past good experience c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 87, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ood suggestions to their fellow members who are going through the same situations lik...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Going
...tions to their fellow members who are going through the same situations like them. ...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 74, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... like them. On the other side there are less chances that the people with less exp...
^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
... side there are less chances that the people with less experience can succeed in the...
^^^^^^
Line 23, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...ot be able to uplift the organization with their work. The fair way to give s...
^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...ormance. The salaries should be given according to their work performance. And with the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 31, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Field
...formance and continuation in the same field for long time gives the seniority. ...
^^^^^
Line 37, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... for the earlier work experience that they have. When compared to fresher and havi...
^^^^
Line 41, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...experience in the present company and they can also be benefited with their produc...
^^^^
Line 47, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Organization
...ing the highest productivity to their organization.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 269.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18215613383 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70653416365 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 215.323595506 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457249070632 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9392606264 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.230769231 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.76923076923 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 17.0 4.97078651685 342% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235675206507 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121821399571 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129160486162 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094146327449 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121296219695 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.