Should governments provide free university education to poor students who are admitted university?
Many people would agree with the argument that governments should provide free university-level education to students who cannot afford to pay tuition. The argument seems rational at first sight; however, there are disagreeable points to certain extent.
Admittedly, free university education for poor student would have significant meaning to those students. A degree of education and social achievement have strong causal relation. So, if poor students also can go to university without worrying about tuition, it will be great opportunity for them to get out of their financially corrupted situation and achieve more socially and economically. Historically, education has been regard as an only exit of poverty. For instance, African-American people have devoted to nurture their degree of education to end-up their generations of poverty and achieve political power. As a result, well-educated African-American Barak Obama has been elected as a president of United States. It he didn’t have any opportunity to go to college and get high-level education, he couldn’t devoted himself to enhance equity in society of United States. So, whether poor or not, all students have to have equal opportunity to get university-level education and governmental supports would be beneficial to the students who cannot go to university because of their financial condition.
However, the thing should be considered in advance to validate the argument is, the fact that there are plenty of financial support programs which already exist for students who cannot afford to go to university. Considering these programs, it is questionable that governments’ support is needed as well. In other words, governments’ support for free education can be redundant solution for poor students. In addition, Governments’ budget could be used in other priorities rather than supporting college-level students such as preventing epidemic disease or supporting people suffering from natural disaster which are more crucial. In this point of view, the argument is disagreeable because governments’ support for educating poor students would be less beneficial for overall society. Furthermore, if governments intervene to support students to go to university and spend their budget additionally, the entire tax will be increased. The increased tax would be unfair to some people who can afford tuition of university or who don’t have any children have university-level education.
In sum, although governments’ support for poor student can give those students more opportunity to get highly-educated and to get away from their plight; it can be general loss of society.
- Should governments provide free university education to poor students who are admitted university? 66
- It is more harmful to compromise one’s own beliefs than adhere to them. 54
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake Houserestaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little imp 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 648, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...atural disaster which are more crucial. In this point of view, the argument is dis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2292.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42519707462 2.79657885939 122% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0452474179 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354585041159 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128684399916 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112378200995 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24024842953 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627098262433 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.1639044944 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.