Society is governed by two types of laws, just and unjust. People must obey just laws but are at liberty to defy those laws which they determine are frivolous or unjust.
Laws were created by people in the desire for a comfortable and safe life of the society as a whole. The prosperity of a society has the primary importance, not the well-being of a particular person. So, if someone feels, that there is an unjust law, it may be unjust only to him, but not to the whole society. Braking an “unjust” law is the same as braking “just” law, in other words, it is prohibited.
In a modern democratic society laws are established via public approval and voting, thus, laws can not be unjust for a majority of people. In case someone disagrees with the decision of the majority, he should find a legal way of expressing his opinion and put some effort to change the law legally – he should “ask” other society members. Braking the law usually results in making it more strict and, of course, a criminal record for the offender.
Unfortunately, unjust laws do exist. People should protest against these laws, but in a peaceful manner. The more there are protestants, the more there are chances that justice will take place. In other words, only the majority defines what is right and what is wrong.
- Museums should have the liberty to exhibit whatever displays they want without the interference of government censorship. 60
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 93
- If everyone would closely examine their past, they would realize that only a few individuals have played a role in shaping their behaviour and their way of thinking. 55
- When people work in teams, they are more productive than when they work individually. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 85
flaws:
No. of Words: 199 350
Minimum 250 words wanted
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 199 350
No. of Characters: 888 1500
No. of Different Words: 111 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.756 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.462 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.426 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 42 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.091 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.403 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.361 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.534 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5