A very interesting discussion in educating young children is that whether parents or society should spot the children’s special talents and provide them opportunities for training at an earlier age. Opponents hold the concern that this would probably violates the self-interest of the children, narrowing their access to a wider range of development and it might give additional pressure for children at a very young age, thus would impact on the healthy development of individuals in a rounded- manner. This might sound plausible, however I do support the idea that such an opportunity would provide children more benefit than those children who don’t have. Let me elaborate my points below.
To begin with, it is rational to doubt that by leading children to develop in a certain area which they are good at, would to some degree shift their study focus, therefore reduce their time and energy to concentrate in other areas. In reality, an excellent training program will not only interfere children’s development, but will help increase children’s ability to manage their strength and weakness. Once realizing the weak points of ourselves, can we allocate more time and energy to make up for something we are not so good at. A person showing extraordinary talent in one area are open to obtain knowledge and skills in other aspects as well. Besides, one still have the freedom to choose his focus in the future regardless of whether this area is what he showed special talent in. Hence, it wouldn’t be much of a problem to provide training in one area which a child is good at.
Furthermore, this practice saves a lot of time in terms of self-evaluating. A lot of adults feel lost and confused in their life without knowing what are their interest and strength. If someone has helped them to identify their talent and offer a chance to educate them in related aspects at an early age, this would greatly benefit them in a clear self-evaluation and even contribute to their future career planning. One cannot afford to waste their youth on experimenting things they are unfamiliar with, which is time-consuming and effort-costing. On the contrary, children with a particular training at young age will exhibit clear direction in their future development. My friend Jane was good at painting when she was five. Her parents sent her to a professional painting institution to improve her skill. It is during the learning, that she explored her great passion for painting and decided to devote herself in painting career. After she finished her major of painting in university, she successfully realized her dream of becoming a painting teacher. While her classmates, many kept searching for a job or changing jobs endlessly.
Finally, helping children to develop their talents at a young age can significantly enhance their confidence. Nowadays, confidence plays an essential role in many scenarios, whether it is in an interview, making a speech, or making a persuasion. Confidence is the key to success. Children with a relatively higher performance in a certain area than other peers feel satisfied with themselves, thanks to the opportunities of an early training. On the contrary, if children are not showing any talents or strength, they would tend to go into an introvert-self, especially when they notice they fall behind other students.
In summary, it is actually a very wise choice to identify children’s special talents and train them in these areas. With all the benefits stated above, children that receive trainings in special areas will enjoy more advantages than children who don’t.
- Although innovations such as video,computers,and the internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students,these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 75
- The following appeared in a memorandum from a dean at Omega University."Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega profess 83
- Claim: In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, 79
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 29
- "Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years, a recent survey of video-game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed. The survey asked video-game players what features they thought were most impo 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'violate'
Suggestion: violate
...ld the concern that this would probably violates the self-interest of the children, narr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, in summary, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3049.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 591.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15905245347 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93056706295 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01324232275 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 306.0 215.323595506 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 945.0 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2681251872 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.925925926 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.51851851852 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31165680839 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810364580211 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717286018382 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182833970017 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376963539272 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.