Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author contends that society should help children who have special talents, to nurture it from inchoate stages only. I personally do not concur with the author's contention. However, to substantiate my point of view this essay will elaborate my reasons.
It is often quipped "you become what you think", i.e. your destiny is in your hand, if a child believes in himself and have that urge to pursue his interests, there is no need for the society to help him unearth his talents. Claim demands society to nurture child's talent, it is just an external factor. The one with the talent and determination does not get affected by these kind of issues.
Moreover, suppose we give this authority of nurturing child's talent but, what is the guarantee that they will see the talent accurately. Society is made of people like you and me and there are high chances that we commit mistake in identifying skills of child. For example: society or say even child's family might mistakenly thinks that their child is performing exemplary in mathematics, and divert him towards mathematics but, it may be the case that he is good at maths but he loves dancing. We are humans and we have to understand that we might commit mistakes and hence, we keep a safe distance from this decision making process and only guide children instead of goading children to pursue what you think is his talent.
Society is qualified; society can only percieve what it sees through its eyes and listens with its ears. Society only knows few professions and talents of myriad of talents in the world and hence would be able to categorize children in those categories only. For example - if say there is kid in a rural area of India, where people are not well educated. If a child there find paper craft fascinating his parents wouldn't allow him to pursue his interests just because parents thinks its pointless. Hence, society might not know what is right and wrong for a kid especially when its a point of kid's inclination.
Society being partisan may promote a particular profession or may help only those kids who "they" think are talented. this might firstly, act as a barrier to child's ambition. For example: say if a boy wants to perform a dance form named Kathak normally pursued by girls. His parents and so called society might try to discourage him, if they knew about his inclination. Lastly, we might also work other way around i.e. by discovering the interests of child and stopping it if they do not fit into the society's architecture.
There is also a silver lining to this dark cloud named society. There might some cases where society played a very good role in promoting and developing kid's talent. But this is completely contingent on several factors as stated above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-28 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | 50 | view |
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 50
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fisherman into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 63
- People's behaviour is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 16
- An ancient, traditional remedy for insomnia—the scent of lavender flowers—has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where the 59
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ly. I personally do not concur with the authors contention. However, to substantiate my...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... determination does not get affected by these kind of issues. Moreover, suppose we give...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocess and only guide children instead of goading children to pursue what you thin...
^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... those categories only. For example - if say there is kid in a rural area of Indi...
^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ind paper craft fascinating his parents wouldnt allow him to pursue his interests just...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inating his parents wouldnt allow him to pursue his interests just because parent...
^^
Line 7, column 581, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ght and wrong for a kid especially when its a point of kids inclination. Society...
^^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ho 'they' think are talented. this might firstly, act as a barrier to chil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, well, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2309.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84067085954 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58886374157 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538784067086 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9638888719 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.391304348 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7391304348 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34782608696 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1874809919 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526487900818 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047114355762 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102236224936 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461035567583 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.