Society should identify those children who have special talents and abilities and begin training them at an early age so that they can eventually excel in their areas of ability.
"Highly gifted", "precocious", "high-potential"… Children with IQs far above average have elicited a great deal of theories and works, from physicians to philosophers. Since the role of a society is to provide all its citizens with means for them to blisfull flourish, apt facilities and trainings should be at disposal since early age for anyone expressing great sensivity to a field. Though, these identifications should be proceeded in the interests of the child, which would subsequently benefit his family and country, but not in the reversed sense.
Admittedly, formal systems aren't suited for children with higher intelligence or advanced sense of understanding and reasoning. It tends to circumscribe their minds causing frustration and many dropping out of school since early stages. Governments by means of educational institutions are then required to accompany parents as well as their child so that both can engage in a symbiotic process for the pupil to burgeon. Consider Terrence Tao, an Austalian mathematician, whom have been awarded the Fields Medal and assisted his first college course at 9. The mundane curriculum couldn't satiate his avid desire for maths, nor meet his educational demand. Therefore, the society recognised his talent and allowed him to pursue, at his pace, his studies. Not only this special training befitted him, but also made the whole maths field improve and ameliorated our world.
It is also important to note that talent is hardly palpable, especially when it comes to studies. Instances refuting an eugenicism where children from underprivileged surrounding have strong predilection abound ; and families who aren't qualified for recognizing their child's special abilities should be supported by professionals in public schools. Research and academia are indeed in accordance that many children are intelligent or have a colorfoul mind, but society doesn't properly emphasise qualities that might sometimes be hidden. Through special programs or independent schools, and with the means we dispose of nowadays, the abilities and talents should always be maximized, which would in turn benefit the whole society and prevent further problems from erecting, such as unemployment nay criminality.
Such an exposure is applied worldwide in sport areas, for talentuous children are trained in myriad disciplines from football to diving. While it is true that physical abilities are easier to be recognized than mental's, it doesn't preclude many governements to fund facilities and experts to best fiercely train children since early stages of development. There is however some worrying fallouts ensuing these pratiques, raising ethical issues. Rigorous and strict trainings aren't suited for all children, and the individual mental inclination must be heeded before great amount of time and efforts are put through into a discipline. Government's or parent's will, and their expected outcomes, must not impinge upon the child's well-being. It has however been seen in autocratic regimes and in family surroundings, that the race to excelling in certain areas since early age sometimes slides into the realm of mercenary and personal interests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | KUSH K PATEL | 75 | view |
| 2020-12-02 | maximeeee12222 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | lan122333 | 50 | view |
| 2019-03-18 | Panshikaj | 33 | view |
| 2018-10-07 | ishi | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 83
- Some people claim that a nations s government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain 83
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 75
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 83
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'expresses'.
Suggestion: expresses
... at disposal since early age for anyone expressing great sensivity to a field. Though, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ed sense. Admittedly, formal systems arent suited for children with higher intelli...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ege course at 9. The mundane curriculum couldnt satiate his avid desire for maths, nor ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... predilection abound ; and families who arent qualified for recognizing their childs ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t or have a colorfoul mind, but society doesnt properly emphasise qualities that might...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...asier to be recognized than mentals, it doesnt preclude many governements to fund faci...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 475, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...l issues. Rigorous and strict trainings arent suited for all children, and the indivi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2732.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62139917695 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22216832128 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 294.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 837.0 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8792082669 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.6 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267108156181 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654965706509 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470679668863 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148900151983 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417071973306 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 100.480337079 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.