Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training to them at an early age to develop their talents
It is said that slow, but consistent progress is always better than fast but haphazard progress. The same can be said about any discipline. Starting early and consistently working towards betterment is always better than starting late and trying to rush through the stages. The prompt says that ‘society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training to them at an early age to develop their talents’. I agree with this statement to a large extent. I shall present two arguments as to why this is true and one argument showing why this may not necessarily be the case.
The benefits of starting early and the power of the ‘compounding effect’ are well proven throughout history. Warren Buffet, known as the ‘Oracle of Omaha’, is one of the most revered investors on this planet. His investment tips are followed and respected by young and auteur investors alike. In one of his books, he stated that he started investing at a tender age of ten, and accumulated his first million when he turned thirty. Had he started much later in life, him turning a millionaire at the age of thirty would have been a mere dream, and would never have been recognized by the society for his achievements.
Further, research has proved time and again that starting any discipline at an early age has a much quicker learning curve compared to starting at an older age. This is true whether it is languages, art, dance or mathematics. Hence, if the society recognizes talent at an early age, it could help many youngsters become pundits in their field and achieve what they are capable of, in turn benefitting the progress of the society.
However, a downside to recognizing talents at a younger age and providing them special training would mean differentiating them from the ‘ordinary’ kids. This could lead to discontent and the development of complexes among kids. The ‘talented’ ones could start looking down on their peers and start behaving in an entitled manner, just because they are seemingly ‘talented’ and the others are not. This sort of discrimination could be detrimental to the kids’ self-esteem and their mental image and affect their confidence levels in the long run.
To conclude, while there may be some arguments that are indeed valid as to recognizing talent early on may not be the best, the overall consequences of doing so would be positive and might benefit the society as a whole in the long run.
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or a parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 70
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training to them at an early age to develop their talents 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 66
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the po
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have never been
...would have been a mere dream, and would never have been recognized by the society for his achie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to curve'
Suggestion: to curve
...n early age has a much quicker learning curve compared to starting at an older age. T...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, so, well, while, as to, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96626506024 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80327453011 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556626506024 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0767066883 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.473684211 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403763476439 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112711835563 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206817688754 0.0758088955206 273% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207278752264 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105351343352 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have never been
...would have been a mere dream, and would never have been recognized by the society for his achie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to curve'
Suggestion: to curve
...n early age has a much quicker learning curve compared to starting at an older age. T...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, so, well, while, as to, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96626506024 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80327453011 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556626506024 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0767066883 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.473684211 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403763476439 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112711835563 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206817688754 0.0758088955206 273% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207278752264 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105351343352 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.