Admittedly, human activities have led a dramatic impact to the nature environment. Besides the damage we bring to the ecological systems, the contamination that we release to the atmosphere is also one of the reasons of the extinction of animals that should survive. However, human-being are not the exhaustive god that have the capability to save all the extincted animals. From my point of view, we should do what we can do and try to save the animals that die out due to human factors. In the following contexts, I will provide three subpoints to support the arugments.
First of all, the power of the society is trivial and diverse, which cannot make an effective difference to save the all the animals. As its known to all, even though most ordinary people are the major composition of the human-being, as contrast to their counterpart as scientist or celebrities, it is still a hard problem to advocate all the people together to protect the enviornment and the animals. At the same time, Some of the animal that cannot survive and facing a decrease of population is exactly because of the increase of human population and the augment of the need for more territory. It is implausible to say that for the sake of protection the animal, we advocate that people should restrict their range of activities.
Secondly, the extinction is a natural process on earth. Before the appearence of human-beings, animals die out because of several factors: food, water, predatory field, and so on. From this point of view, it is not suggestive for people to make interferences to the natural process that it should occur, which represents the basic rule on Earth. Needless to say, human ourselves are one of the component of the nature, not to mention how could we have the capability to save all the animals.
Thirdly, the technical issue has always be the greatest obstacle for human to save the extinctive animals. The best we can do is to save the animals that are decreasing by setting up protection area or raise them in exprimental base, where we can find out their habit and living style. Only after a broad recognition we have, can we save them better.
Conclusively, it is hard to say that all the animals human could save, especially for those are already extinct. The power of the society is too diverse to concrete and advocate. The natural process should not be influence by human ideology. Last but not least, it is implausible for the technology to revive the animals that have already extincted .
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Admittedly, human activities have led a dramatic imp...
^^
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls that die out due to human factors. In the following contexts, I will provide t...
^^
Line 2, column 421, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ment and the animals. At the same time, Some of the animal that cannot survive and facing a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 555, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of the increase of human population and the augment of the need for more territory. It is i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...Thirdly, the technical issue has always be the greatest obstacle for human to save...
^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their habit and living style. Only after a broad recognition we have, can we save...
^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the animals that have already extincted .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82134570766 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77273848455 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477958236659 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1918336524 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165200815932 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058049224856 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341628454901 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104160833333 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255354796247 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Admittedly, human activities have led a dramatic imp...
^^
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls that die out due to human factors. In the following contexts, I will provide t...
^^
Line 2, column 421, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ment and the animals. At the same time, Some of the animal that cannot survive and facing a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 555, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of the increase of human population and the augment of the need for more territory. It is i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...Thirdly, the technical issue has always be the greatest obstacle for human to save...
^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their habit and living style. Only after a broad recognition we have, can we save...
^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the animals that have already extincted .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82134570766 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77273848455 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477958236659 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1918336524 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165200815932 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058049224856 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341628454901 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104160833333 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255354796247 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.