Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Do we really know about all the species that exist in this world? And is there a way to save all of them from extinction? Many of us would say no. Since the human evolution there have lived many species which scientists and paleontologists are still finding out about like dinosaurs. So, there may be nothing we could do about the species that we have no knowledge about yet, there is a way of saving them which we do know and are researching about. There may be many of us who would argue that species that are essential to sustain human life and that are on the brink of extinction because of the anthropogenic activities should be the only ones to be saved from extinction. I, on the other hand believe that all human, animal and plant life that breeds on the earth is essential and should be preserved regardless of their usability to humans.
Nowadays, there is always being written about the endangered land and marine species that succumb to activities like deforestation and water being polluted by different industries. There should be strict measures taken in order to preserve this distinct form of life because the beauty of earth lies in the disparate nature and form of these living beings. There has been many actions taken and conservatories made in order to promote and help these species that stop evolving because their habitat is destroyed due to deforestation or polluted water. Now some would migrate in order to save themselves from extinction, but it is extremely hard for them to build and ecosystem and therefore, capitulates against the force of nature.
On the other hand, if a distinct race of specie is a result of cupidity between the two extant breed. There could be ways to preserve those by mating those breeds. Also, more efforts should be made for the families that have no other way to be conserved and little known facts about them. Because researching them may lead to new and innovating possibilities of securing them from the onslaught of nature.
All in all, I think that every specie should be saved regardless of the fact that its potential extinction could be caused by humans or not because that is the only way we could know more about the nature and earth and that may lead to new discoveries and panaceas for the world’s problems and diseases
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- “When something is judged as ugly or lacking in style, it is because it is being perceived by someone other than its target audience."Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 23
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agr 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, as for, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75561097257 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59421868484 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466334164589 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2307580409 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.1875 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0625 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155218153742 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583117319024 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359672403318 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106420452207 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273905206035 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.