Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Although it is undeniable that as human overpopulated this earth and depleted natural resources, a mass extinction is taking place. As heartbreaking as this inconvenient truth is, the concerted effort from the society to save endangered species should not be based on an emotional decision or a guilt-trip. Whether the species’ peril is the result of human activities should not be the primary indicator of whether we should save it.
Unfortunately, the process of extinction is irreversible for a species, hence the decision of whether to save a species needs extremely careful deliberation. With our often limited ability to manipulate the ecological system, the exact consequences involved in a species’ extinction are beyond control of human. In the most extreme case, the disappearance of a keystone species in an ecosystem can result in the collapse of the entire equilibrium, and threatens the livelihood of many other species, and even human, if a dangerous pest is no longer kept in check. Whether the extinction is caused by human activities is rather peripheral in this case, and the role of the species in the ecosystem becomes the key consideration. Unreserved efforts to stop extinction are required for all species playing important roles in the ecosystem, no matter the reason of their peril.
Not only has the biodiversity kept the environment function properly, they also inspired brilliance in the field of literature, art and technology. Millions of novels, with the most famous being The old man and the sea, explore the beautiful relation between man and nature. There is also an entire genre of painting dedicated to the immense and imposing beauty of nature. Technology benefitted incredibly from our observation of how animals and plants thrive, and so did medicine. Multiple efficient drugs against parasites such as malaria are distilled from plants.
It is also worth noting the intricacy of the ecosystem. Just as manipulating factors in the ecosystem is difficult, unravelling the role of human activity in the ecosystem is also near impossible. There is no controlled experiment that can be undertaken to test plausible theories, at least not under ethical approvals. Therefore, the decision of whether a species’ potential extinction is a result of human activity is often naive and prone to error.
As a result, it is important to try to save all endangered species, with special priorities being placed on species that plays a key role in the ecosystem, and not the ones that we feel the guiltiest towards.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 32
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town-Adams Realty and Fitch Realty-Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work 75
- Some people believe that in order to thrive a society must put its own overall success before the well being of its individual citizens Others believe that the well being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people 71
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 91
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'at least', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233333333333 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.146666666667 0.157235817809 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.111111111111 0.0880659088768 126% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0577777777778 0.0497285424764 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0222222222222 0.0444667217837 50% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137777777778 0.12292977631 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0466666666667 0.0406280797675 115% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.05645959742 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.02 0.030933414821 65% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.131111111111 0.0997080785238 131% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0111111111111 0.0249443105267 45% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00666666666667 0.0148568991511 45% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2557.0 2732.02544248 94% => OK
No of words: 410.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23658536585 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.40243902439 0.366273622748 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.336585365854 0.280924506359 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.241463414634 0.200843997647 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.187804878049 0.132149295362 142% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05645959742 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 219.290929204 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519512195122 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 58.2259180904 55.4138127331 105% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.7777777778 23.380412469 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.081497561 59.4972553346 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.055555556 141.124799967 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 23.380412469 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 56.4363143631 51.4728631049 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.8431372549 1.64882698954 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.568566861561 0.391690518653 145% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.155139913761 0.123202303941 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10047424156 0.077325440228 130% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.615308766521 0.547984918172 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173452302206 0.149214159877 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.241866336854 0.161403998019 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130027160118 0.0892212321368 146% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.403143694658 0.385218514788 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0398641269066 0.0692045440612 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.371013482562 0.275328986314 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958578691146 0.0653680567796 147% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.