Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
When it comes to the issue the importance of preservation endangered species, some people believe that we have an obligation to protect not only endangered species, but also whole creatures. However, others have the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the former point carries more weight. I take this position on account of the following reasons.
To illustrate my position, let us to take a look on why some people dislike the idea of protection of species. To preserve the nature and species, we need pay much money for researches and employees, while most countries have not a proper economic condition. The rate of unemployment is a trouble crisis not only in the poor country but also in the developed Western countries. So, governments should pay more attention important predicaments, which affects people’s life directly.
A further point we must consider is that human have an ethical duty to protect on the nature, because they are reprehensible in animals’ extinction. Some people say that several extinctions were happened in the history of the Earth, so it is a common process and we should not be involved in this matter. However, they ignore that the scenario is different in the recent age. After industrial revolution, human activities had increased so tremendously that nature is not able to restore itself. Ozone depletion, air and water pollution, soil erosion, and even deforestation are a small part of human’s effective on the nature and species. From the moral angle, human have to preserve the nature and species in order to compensate their past mistakes.
All above evidence supports this undeniable that we should protect other species because our survival depends on them, and also it is a moral responsible. Of course, as an English proverbs goes “a coin has two sides”; therefore, those who have the opposite view partially reasonable that this project surely is expensive. Nevertheless, I think that its profits outweigh dangerous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. 58
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 73
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 86
- When People Succeed, It Is Because Of Hard Work. Luck Has Nothing To Do With Success." Do You Agree Or Disagree With The Quotation Above? Use Specific Reasons And Examples To Explain Your Position. 30
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n on account of the following reasons. To illustrate my position, let us to tak...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'i think', 'of course']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23544973545 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.12962962963 0.157235817809 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.113756613757 0.0880659088768 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0582010582011 0.0497285424764 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0529100529101 0.0444667217837 119% => OK
Prepositions: 0.100529100529 0.12292977631 82% => OK
Participles: 0.010582010582 0.0406280797675 26% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.96921046649 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0238095238095 0.030933414821 77% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103174603175 0.0997080785238 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.010582010582 0.0249443105267 42% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010582010582 0.0148568991511 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2004.0 2732.02544248 73% => OK
No of words: 322.0 452.878318584 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.22360248447 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388198757764 0.366273622748 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.326086956522 0.280924506359 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.229813664596 0.200843997647 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155279503106 0.132149295362 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96921046649 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 219.290929204 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605590062112 0.48968727796 124% => OK
Word variations: 69.3317256863 55.4138127331 125% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9411764706 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0571349712 59.4972553346 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.882352941 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.674092028746 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 51.5498721228 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.43956043956 1.64882698954 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382135933079 0.391690518653 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0863457850669 0.123202303941 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0717606093906 0.077325440228 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.483705825166 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.112136828501 0.149214159877 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136321287764 0.161403998019 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781557873928 0.0892212321368 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.348293170533 0.385218514788 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0698782954673 0.0692045440612 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259411806405 0.275328986314 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712545778683 0.0653680567796 109% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.