Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
The author mentions that in order to prepare young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields the best way for the society is to imbibe in them the sense of cooperation and not competition. I agree with the authors claim. In todays fast paced world, youth is the main driving force of the society. Young people are energetic, optimistic and have the potential to be a good leader if they are guided by the society in a right way.
In todays work enviroments around the world, it is often said that cooperation is the key to success. There are many companies around the world having many leaders running the companies with their teams. If the leader is cooperative and understanding even the employees respect the leader and work passionately towards his/her leader. For example, if in a company if there is competition between team leaders about the time required for the projects to be successfully completed, then the project leaders will put pressure on the team to complete the project faster. In this case the entire team will always work in pressure and eventually make mistakes. But if the team leader understands his/her team and not put pressure on them and cooperate with them then it is obvious that the team performance will be excellent.
It is also true in the governments also, for example if a prime minister of a developing country tries to compete with the developed countries then it is possible that the it leads to problems. For example, if a country tries to bring in bullet train network even when its normal rail connectivities have multiple issues then it is obvious that many people will face issues. Rather, the goverment must cooperate with the citizen and understand their problems and solve that first rather than competing with other countries.
However, there should be a healthy competition in order to bring the best version of self. For example, there are multiple competitions and tounaments which go all around the year like olympics, world cups. In these competitions multiple contenders participate. This helps to boost confidence of an individual if he.she wins the tournaments, or the individual can assess what is going wrong if he/she loses.
To sum up, I think that cooperation is the best thing the leader should have. There should be healthy competition among the people in order to achieve something good.
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 63
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects to specialize in one specific subject. 73
- Summarize points in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in reading passage 3
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eader if they are guided by the society in a right way. In todays work enviroments around t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...oped countries then it is possible that the it leads to problems. For example, if a co...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, for example, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97493734336 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72568115439 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496240601504 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4255969284 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.473684211 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297975220662 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08297094846 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630820253903 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151699293791 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06648248072 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.