Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Leaders should be deft themselves while able to incorporate various ideas of others. While a competitive nature may enhance one's capabilities as a leader, it may corrupt the compunction that one possesses. In addition, getting along with others may be a better way to guide people instead of competing with them.
Admittedly, competition is a efficient way to develop abilities. Through competition, people are able to push themselves further and advance because of the nature of craving to win. For example, Michael Jordan admitted in his hall of fame acceptance speech that his competitiveness was the fuel for driving him to train harder, making him the best basketball player ever: without competition, he would have trained and played naively thus would have been unable to show his superhuman performance. Since leaders should possess competence that excel others, competitive nature should be promoted to help these people establish the aptness required for their professions.
Nevertheless, too much competition may result in a lack of morals in individuals. In the contemporary society, the competition has become fiercer than ever, and to survive in this milieu people sometimes has to compromise ethics, which would not be a virtue pursued by a leader. For instance, may government officials in Korea evade the military service - which takes two years to finish and return to the society - in order to have a head start in society. These leaders are often indicted for their lack of compunction and derelict in their obligations and are relegated from their vocations. Therefore, too much competence can hinder the morals of a individual, unqualifying them for a prominent position.
Last but not least, cooperation is a virtue that may lead to discovering social problems and a means to solving those predicaments. Nowadays, no single individual can govern the whole society. A group of people through conventions and communication come up with legislations or policies that are suitable for the current community. For instance, the president isn't the only person to decide a nation's policy: members of the congress are all involved in the decision process. Therefore, to communicate efficiently and thus come up with propitious politics, the president should not only be pertinent himself, but also able to work together with various people.
In conclusion, although some extent of competition may enhance a leaders capabilities, it may derogate one's moral standards in a attempt to achieve a better result. Moreover, the ability to communicate and work together may be a higher virtue required in modern leaders of the society.
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning 66
- Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is, in fact, the general welfare of all its people.Write a respons 66
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 82
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... While a competitive nature may enhance ones capabilities as a leader, it may corrup...
^^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...h them. Admittedly, competition is a efficient way to develop abilities. Thr...
^
Line 9, column 652, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...uch competence can hinder the morals of a individual, unqualifying them for a pro...
^
Line 13, column 361, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... community. For instance, the president isnt the only person to decide a nations pol...
^^^^
Line 13, column 394, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...sident isnt the only person to decide a nations policy: members of the congress are all...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 128, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...it may derogate ones moral standards in a attempt to achieve a better result. Mor...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37081339713 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02168654383 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555023923445 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5445917726 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.157894737 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203738891129 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645741313706 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663949618234 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122255921586 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529823214066 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.