The main purpose of education is to prepare an individual for better survival in today's competitive environment and have a prosperous life. This is where the important decisions like choosing a field of study for higher education play a crucial part. Whether to completely align one's course of study solely to his/her interests can further be evaluated based on the upcoming arguments.
Firstly, sustainability of any pursuit depends on its economic viability. Education being one of the longest and important pursuits of one's life should also cater to this basic requirement. Having the course of education solely based on interests rather than economic viability can pose as a blunder in one's life as the life needs to be sustained economically and education first and foremost is a solid caterer to that requirement.
Secondly, it has been brought forward in many erudite discussions since a long time that talents and interests don't have innate but rather a developmental nature. If one pursues a field long enough to see some tangible rewards, his or her interest grows which further feedbacks his efforts in that field and thus the talent grows.
And finally and appeasingly, even if an individual finds his interests and talents in contradiction with what the market demands, the current complex and innovative world allows amalgamations of fields to cater the necessity for innovation. An apposite example can be that of a programmer who can apply his coding skills to solve economic problems the market needs desperately to be solved or of a visual artist who can design the illustrations for different websites. Such examples of amalgamation of different interests and fields are ubiquitous in today's world.
Through the above given arguments it can be clearly showed that the college majors should be selected keeping in mind the economic viability of such majors. Further, if one pursues what he has chosen to do with diligence he can create a cycle of reward and effort which develops both his talents and interests in a field. Also, there is no dearth of opportunities to amalgamate different interests to cater the economic requirements of the society.
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 75
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r higher education play a crucial part. Whether to completely align ones course of stud...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ucial part. Whether to completely align ones course of study solely to his/her inter...
^^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...f the longest and important pursuits of ones life should also cater to this basic re...
^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...omic viability can pose as a blunder in ones life as the life needs to be sustained ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... a long time that talents and interests dont have innate but rather a developmental ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17563739377 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90842561585 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543909348442 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5056068821 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155283677388 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592835312869 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477679942129 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930025175696 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349972361803 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.