To begin with, I have to admit that this is truly a very controversial topic issue, which means there is no standard correct answer for this issue. On one hand, choosing a field of study based on students' own talents and interests absolutely can make students devote themselves in this field without hesitation because of their curiosity. On the other hand, considering availability of jobs when choosing a field of study is also significant, because a well-paid job means life of high quality, which is also most people's purpose and dream for their whole life. In my opinion, I would say to choose a field based on your own talents and interests should be considered more compared with the latter.
First of all, as I mentioned above, interests is the best teacher. If you have curiosity about the field you are going to study, tedious and dull work won't prevent you from pursuing the truth or reality you want to achieve. The inventor of the bulbs, Thomas Edison has a household fame. I think it is also well-known that how he eventually found the material that can endure extremely high temperature when the bulbs are alighted through thousands of experiments and trying which turned out to be failure. What if he didn't have any interests for this study of bulbs? So many times failure will absolutely destroy his confidence and wiliness to continue the study and maybe modern human beings can't have this flamboyant night life any more. Once a student has interests in their field he is studying, he will less likely be defeated by setbacks and has stronger perseverance to finish the study because of this uncanny curiosity.
Secondly, many contributions made on the history of science are by genius and talented people. For instance, the ground-breaking relativity theory issued by Albert Einstein was definitely a unprecedented accomplishment known by every person even most of them do not major in physics. It is common knowledge, however, that it is because his brilliant thought and talent made him achieve this accomplishment. Had a ordinary university student study this kind of recondite stuff, he would never come up with the same achievement. This is because usually achievements to improve the whole human society, whether this is in the science field or not, is extremely difficult which means only talented people have the chance to figure out these monsters.
However, it is not wise to totally deny the availability of jobs when you choose a field. Because not all of students study in the college has a clear understanding on what they are interested in and what they want to do in the future. For those who do not have a clear and definitive purpose or schedule for their future life, it is still a good option for them to consider the availability of jobs when choosing the field. At least, to survive and make a pretty good living will not be a problem bothering them in the future.
To sum up, considering their own talents and interests when coming to select a field of study will be the first thing I recommend them to do, since most college students, I think, come to the college with ambitions. For those do not have any interests or thought, considering availability of jobs when choosing field will also be a good option.
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 62
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 70
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 16
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent s 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ch turned out to be failure. What if he didnt have any interests for this study of bu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
...erests for this study of bulbs? So many times failure will absolutely destroy his con...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...the study and maybe modern human beings cant have this flamboyant night life any mor...
^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ssued by Albert Einstein was definitely a unprecedented accomplishment known by e...
^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...de him achieve this accomplishment. Had a ordinary university student study this ...
^
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...ring availability of jobs when choosing field will also be a good option.
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'at least', 'for instance', 'i think', 'kind of', 'first of all', 'in my opinion', 'to begin with', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217105263158 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.174342105263 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0805921052632 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0575657894737 0.0497285424764 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0625 0.0444667217837 141% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.115131578947 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0378289473684 0.0406280797675 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72991111702 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0296052631579 0.030933414821 96% => OK
Particles: 0.00657894736842 0.0016655270985 395% => OK
Determiners: 0.100328947368 0.0997080785238 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0164473684211 0.0249443105267 66% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0263157894737 0.0148568991511 177% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3265.0 2732.02544248 120% => OK
No of words: 559.0 452.878318584 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84078711986 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86242540663 4.58838876751 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.320214669052 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24686940966 0.280924506359 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171735241503 0.200843997647 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11091234347 0.132149295362 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72991111702 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 219.290929204 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481216457961 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 57.8197667478 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.4090909091 23.380412469 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9817991033 59.4972553346 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.409090909 141.124799967 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4090909091 23.380412469 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 0.674092028746 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 50.0960318751 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.25698324022 1.64882698954 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394714756226 0.391690518653 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0976237238791 0.123202303941 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0600917732689 0.077325440228 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.503243014015 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120939848295 0.149214159877 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146826736484 0.161403998019 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870547746792 0.0892212321368 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.386705642883 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0322303751778 0.0692045440612 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274851514283 0.275328986314 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742399176842 0.0653680567796 114% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.