Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
The author of the statement claim that one section believes, the government should provide funds to the art field so they can flourish, but others counter this by saying that if the government starts funding the arts then the integrity of the arts will get threatens. In my essay, I will highlight positive and negative points for both the statements and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
Arts is an integral part of the countries historical cultures and traditional, that represent them at the international level. Arts connect cultures when people do not speak the same language, with visual images transcending the boundaries of language. Even within people who speak the same language, the arts provide a channel for communicating ideas, emotions, and values in a way that words alone cannot. The arts then, broad as the term is, are an important part of any culture. So, it should be properly maintained and at the same time should be flourished also.
So, in order to make the art flourished someone has to infuse funds into it. Now the question is who will do that? We have a various option but the best option will be if government provide the funds rather than the private aristocracy because they can only open doors for the art to flourish with the help of education or provide funds or by the advertisement. Even there should separate office for the art and culture that will help this field to nurture and flourished.
But the problem with the government funding that, this field will have complete dominance of government and they will rule this field as per there wish, for example, one government will take care of their art and culture very well but after the election another party won the election and form government and they have no interest in the art and culture or the government will focus or promote only one kind of the art. So, if this thing happens then the government became threatens to the integrity of the arts.
In sum, we say that the best possible way to flourish art is by direct indulgement of government in the funding of art, but there should a sense of freedom so that all sectors of the art and culture will flourish.
- society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents 50
- To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area, but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving he 33
- We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening th 69
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs 44
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...d at the same time should be flourished also. So, in order to make the art flou...
^^^^
Line 13, column 421, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...us or promote only one kind of the art. So, if this thing happens then the government ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76315789474 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53802658524 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478947368421 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.84859191 60.3974514979 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.285714286 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389644681715 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145801251458 0.0831039109588 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111286736619 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258515424727 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517874656548 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.