Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Delineating what and how the government officials should prosecute is a longstanding subject of spurious debates across the globe; should the officials carry out the will of the people they were appointed by to serve or should they base the decisions with own judgement,I for one vouch for the latter.
Although, the fact remains that the officials are appointed to by the people in the society with more legal powers provided to assist in the time of need, but the crux holds that these officials remain just and perform their duties with veracity rather then succumb to the very people they were elected by. Officials carry high judicial powers if utlized with bias and defunct the very purpose it came into being.
We should also understand what we really mean by the will of the people; Who is actually filtering whether the ask by a particular group is vaild, does this take precendance as compared to other tasks at hand?
This really can be a black-or-white scenario and will insinute a demographic chunk no matter what the result is. Taking into consideration the recent events that took place in Delhi (capital of India), where the Jatt community remonstarted out on streets resorting to violance in order to attain special reservation for their community in the public and private sector. Taking a step back to assess the scenario, if the officials gave in --for whatever reason deemed necessesry--it sets in motion a series a steps that can never be taken back.
In all generality, no matter what the issue is the officials shouldd throughly assess the circumstances, place themselves in the situation , and objectively take decision that favors the masses and is a step towards the betterment of the society as whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | DH123 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | ghazalsaed1995 | 75 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | seonjungkim | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | Lutfor Rahman Rony | 66 | view |
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones."In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway will run through 77
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 50
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 33
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...hey base the decisions with own judgment,I for one vouch for the latter. Althou...
^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ople; Who is actually filtering whether the ask by a particular group is valid, does th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, really, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94880546075 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68743104862 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576791808874 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.2571455559 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.25 118.986275619 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.625 23.4991977007 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260054523752 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985116644121 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912145037587 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132924771608 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999598435073 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 48.8420337079 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.8971910112 223% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.