Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Glancing back through the modern history, one can undoubtedly notice the involvement of political leaders in almost every facet of improvement or cast a debacle throughout the period. To adorn the world as it is now politician has to possess subtle principle and objectives which actually motivated the whole supporters to act as a whole in developing the today's skeleton of modern society. While some may argue that political leaders should be more strict to their views and principle, i will firm with my belief - To embellish the nation with hope and prosperity, political leaders need to give heed to the public opinion.
Stepping into the modern era, we have established a rigid base in the world separately in accordance to our cultural and ethnic dichotomies. This establishment is not done without the act of co operation. If we follow past our recent world and travel to the medieval time, we will see the continuous strife perpetuated for years that totally end up in long lasting collusion and schism between the society. One might wonder why this phenomenon is related to the dictatorship, in fact it is completely related to the relationship between the ruler and the follower. The long lasting feud in our ancestral period was basically caused for the oppressive act of the dictator who never cared for the followers and enacted a authoritarian government. Which is why whole country revolted, imposing a unmitigated situation for longer than one can imagine.
Public opinion is always regarded as an imperial consideration. Abandoning the public opinion can be detrimental as it fails to consider the choice of people and thereby fails to relate the ruler with the public.
History actually teaches this lesson more effectively. By gaining the trust of the people of Zimbabwe president Mugabe established himself as a leader but failed to gain the trust of subjects later, and this actually crippled the whole economic system of the country. Though it may looks like a act of sheer oppression, it is nothing but the negligence of the ruler to pay attention to the people. So it would be complete asinine for the people to think that just strict to the personal opinion can actually help a nation to prosper.
Finally, without the actual bond between the public and the leader the main infrastructure of the whole society will be crumbled. Even if the society seems to be prosperous with a ruler totally unconcerned of public involvement in his action, it is actually a result not for his act but only for the co operation within the group of his admirers and the public. It would appropriate to depict the sub continental revolution scenario against the English in which the whole throng of people was agreed to the decision of Mahatma Gandhi, the idol of liberation of India from the English captivity ople which was burdened to the people for almost 100 years. It was achieved only because the leader gave proper care to his people’s opinion.
However, only by considering the public opinion can make the country prosperous as it sometimes based on infatuation of culture and other incentives. So by understanding the situation act accordingly is the basic quality of a leader.
In conclusion, while there are arguments over principles against public opinion it is always the public opinion which thrives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | yswang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | sudesh tiwari | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Daffodilia | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nimesh94 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ers to act as a whole in developing the todays skeleton of modern society. While some ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 488, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...re strict to their views and principle, i will firm with my belief - To embellish...
^
Line 5, column 718, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ver cared for the followers and enacted a authoritarian government. Which is why ...
^
Line 5, column 792, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...is why whole country revolted, imposing a unmitigated situation for longer than o...
^
Line 11, column 294, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f the country. Though it may looks like a act of sheer oppression, it is nothing ...
^
Line 11, column 479, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...people to think that just strict to the personal opinion can actually help a nation to prosper. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, finally, however, if, look, may, so, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2794.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 554.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04332129964 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83475365079 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 891.9 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0223505998 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218843395561 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638778727983 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522767677037 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119228114842 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444593598559 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.