Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Evolution and extinction is a process of mother nature. Humans, just a minute creation of nature should not interfere with this sublime process. However, some species are on the brink of extinction because of human activity and needs to be saved because it may also result in the extinction of other species.
Admittedly, the extinction of a species is not a anomaly, rather it can be regarded as a natural process of evolution according to Darwin's evolution theory. Human's endeavor to save every form of live is itself a avarice and adulteration of the pristine nature: the nature is most healthy when it is not interfered by human actions. For instance, people tried to save the Galapagos turtles even though it was evident that they were incompetent to survive because they did not possess the traits propitious for evolution. Although we can still see these animals in the zoo, their form of existing could be rendered useless.
On the other hand, we should not overlook the consequences of human activity that made cataclysmic changes in the eco-system. We brought down amazons and rainforests which provided habitation of numerous species, and marine creatures are suffering from the pollution we emit into the ocean, air pollution is detrimental for birds. Humans are responsible for all these derogatory environments that are noxious to living creatures and to rescue these creatures from extinction would be the least we can do.
Finally, letting some species go extinct will cause other interrelated livings to deteriorate as well. The ecosystem is so complicated and intermingled that a extinction of a species might be ominous to the total ecosystem. For example, the extinction of Dodo birds has lead to the extinction or decrease in other species. Thine trees used to spread their seeds through Dodo birds because they ate the fruits of these plants. After the Dodo birds disappeared the plants - which provided shelter to various animals - were unable to dissipate their seeds and the number of them started to dwindle. Consequently, the animals residing in the trees also disappeared into the history. Hence, saving species should be addressed with prudence.
In conclusion, although humans saving every creature in the world may be problematic in the sense of a unsullied nature, we are responsible for the noxious milieu that caused them to be in danger in the first place. Not to mention the negative aftermath of a extinct species can bring to the nature as a whole, we should take responsibility of our actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Kutumba kasyap | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | tulipkatie | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Shivgovind | 55 | view |
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 58
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 54
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 66
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 62
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...dly, the extinction of a species is not a anomaly, rather it can be regarded as a...
^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...or to save every form of live is itself a avarice and adulteration of the pristin...
^
Line 13, column 158, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...is so complicated and intermingled that a extinction of a species might be ominou...
^
Line 17, column 102, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...orld may be problematic in the sense of a unsullied nature, we are responsible fo...
^
Line 17, column 258, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ot to mention the negative aftermath of a extinct species can bring to the nature...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, look, may, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13942307692 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81228719602 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507211538462 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8838371171 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.526315789 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12025622548 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401652204507 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333314727714 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723368717332 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187659824212 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.