Some people believe that success in creative fields, such as painting, fiction writing, and filmmaking, primarily requires hard work and perseverance. Others believe that such success mainly requires innate talents that cannot be learned.
There is a hot debate over whether hard work or innate talent is more vital to achieve success in creative fields. A famous saying goes, "One percent of inspiration and ninety-nine percent of perspiration contribute to success." While it seems to put more emphasis on the importance of hard work, it also addresses the need of innate ability. Yet, I believe that if without perseverance, we cannot expect a good result even he or she is gifted.
It is likely that the statement focuses on the creative field because they are the subjects requiring the most imagination, delicate skills and detailed observation in order to bring out outstanding works. When we think of successful artist or famous writer, we often link them with an early noticed prodigy. For example, I was once impressed by a little girl appeared in a singing contest on a TV show. She sings amazingly beautiful even without any teacher teaches her yet. No one can deny how talents play the central role in this girl.
However, after several years, I searched on the internet about the girl but find only few videos. Then I realized that even a prodigy can becomes nobody if without persistent cultivation and improvement.
Some detractors may argue that success will not come without talent. Admittedly, it will not be an easy task for a normal one to reach success, but it does not mean impossible. For example, Michael Jordan got kicked out of high school basketball team because of poor playing. It shows that he was not viewed as a talented player. Yet, he proved himself by polishing his skills through practicing again and again. As a result, he became a household name. This is unquestionable an inspiration for those who worries about lacking of talent.
In the final analysis, although it may require more hard work for normal people to become successful, chances are still there if we strive toward the goal.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 30 | view |
2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
2023-08-11 | TiOluwani97 | 58 | view |
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 83
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complain 83
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species 54
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years 50
- According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actu 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...Then I realized that even a prodigy can becomes nobody if without persistent cultivatio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91950464396 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72700415802 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643962848297 0.4932671777 131% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5598777634 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2777777778 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189910551262 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490059177188 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541378640929 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091870228174 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604228112177 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.