Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
The issue of whether morality or logical reasoning should be the foundation of education is a contentious one. Both sides have their strengths and weaknesses. In my opinion, teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Teaching moral principles at a tender age incorporates values and makes the child scrupled.
Teaching morality should be the foundation of education because children are more humane when they are taught to love each other. Basic values should be incorporated in them. This way, the child sticks to these values throughout his life. The world becomes a better place, filled with love and harmony. Moreover, when moral values are incorporated in the child at a very young age, they are able to differentiate right from wrong. This could prevent the child from turning into a criminal.
While a reasonable person may contend that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society, it may not always be true. People may be able to think cogently and make better decisions when they think logically. However, trying to justify their decisions with reasoning may not always prove to be useful.
Moreover, teaching logical reasoning will not help solve all problems as many problems do not have a logical solution. Also, emphasising on logical reasoning can curb the creativity of children because they are taught of a structured way to think. Instead, they must be allowed to think out of the box. This can be done by instilling them with moral values and leaving them to make decisions on their own.
For example, in some nations like India, more emphasis is laid on teaching moral values to children at a tender age. As they grow, they learn to make decisions logically. This helps them to make better decisions in the future.
To sum up, teaching a foundation of logical reasoning does not always enable people to produce a moral society. Instead, more emphasis should be made on teaching morality like respect for others, maintaining hygiene, doing what is right etc. This way, we will be able to produce a moral society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | abhbat | 50 | view |
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- READINGProfessors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest ev 83
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns
- An international development organisation, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 54
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'while', 'for example', 'in my opinion', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.202564102564 0.240241500013 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.192307692308 0.157235817809 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0974358974359 0.0880659088768 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0487179487179 0.0497285424764 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0461538461538 0.0444667217837 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.105128205128 0.12292977631 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0589743589744 0.0406280797675 145% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62533305046 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0410256410256 0.030933414821 133% => OK
Particles: 0.0025641025641 0.0016655270985 154% => OK
Determiners: 0.0923076923077 0.0997080785238 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0410256410256 0.0249443105267 164% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0102564102564 0.0148568991511 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2098.0 2732.02544248 77% => OK
No of words: 349.0 452.878318584 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01146131805 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369627507163 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.272206303725 0.280924506359 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203438395415 0.200843997647 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.117478510029 0.132149295362 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62533305046 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 219.290929204 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461318051576 0.48968727796 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.1778473606 55.4138127331 85% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.1739130435 23.380412469 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.564143478 59.4972553346 55% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2173913043 141.124799967 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1739130435 23.380412469 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.478260869565 0.674092028746 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 42.394543416 51.4728631049 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.27678571429 1.64882698954 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384119752518 0.391690518653 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0775302863263 0.123202303941 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0645221458545 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.505005675559 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122880530663 0.149214159877 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128382952973 0.161403998019 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107431179224 0.0892212321368 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.257386151881 0.385218514788 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0692056980621 0.0692045440612 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233405017332 0.275328986314 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735242466894 0.0653680567796 112% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.