People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The issue of whether or not people who make decisions based on emotion rather than logic are poor decision makers is a contentious one. I believe that people who must make decisions must think logically before arriving at a conclusion.
Often, people who make decisions based on emotion do not think of the consequences of their decisions. They just follow their heart. But, the decisions they make at that moment may have adverse effects in future. They should base their decision on the pros and cons of the situation.
Decisions based on emotion give the decision makers emotional satisfaction. They may be happier and more content. However, they may face unexpected consequences if they do not thoroughly think about the pros and cons. The decision they would have made, had they thought of its consequences would have been much better.
In some situations, the consequences they face in future may be trivial ones. However, it may not be the best decision they would have made. Hence, it is always a better option to think logically and then make decisions, based on their consequences. If the consequences are trivial, the decision makers can follow their heart. But, if the consequences are trying, they have the option to base their decision on logic.
To sum up, people who are required to make decisions should think logically because of the adverse effects the decision can have in future. Also, when people base their decisions only on emotion, they always cannot justify those decisions with logic afterwards.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- An international development organisation, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 83
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves.Examples of altruism 80
- READINGProfessors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest ev 83
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. Do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The issue of whether or not people who make decisions based on emot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...at that moment may have adverse effects in future. They should base their decision on the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, it is always a better option to think logically and then make decisions, based...
^^
Line 9, column 130, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e adverse effects the decision can have in future. Also, when people base their decisions...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.20701754386 0.240241500013 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.178947368421 0.157235817809 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0526315789474 0.0880659088768 60% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0736842105263 0.0497285424764 148% => OK
Pronouns: 0.080701754386 0.0444667217837 181% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.101754385965 0.12292977631 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0350877192982 0.0406280797675 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61418753575 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0140350877193 0.030933414821 45% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00350877192982 0.0016655270985 211% => OK
Determiners: 0.0771929824561 0.0997080785238 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0526315789474 0.0249443105267 211% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0175438596491 0.0148568991511 118% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1535.0 2732.02544248 56% => OK
No of words: 253.0 452.878318584 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06719367589 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.58838876751 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.351778656126 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.245059288538 0.280924506359 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173913043478 0.200843997647 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114624505929 0.132149295362 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61418753575 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 219.290929204 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442687747036 0.48968727796 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.2769958608 55.4138127331 73% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 14.8823529412 23.380412469 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3961134827 59.4972553346 49% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2941176471 141.124799967 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8823529412 23.380412469 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.529411764706 0.674092028746 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 39.3882817949 51.4728631049 77% => OK
Elegance: 1.03157894737 1.64882698954 63% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378990094379 0.391690518653 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134154247711 0.123202303941 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0940727101842 0.077325440228 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.551051706322 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123716047941 0.149214159877 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154950448456 0.161403998019 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142976645631 0.0892212321368 160% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.406462991408 0.385218514788 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0722946507405 0.0692045440612 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281375963447 0.275328986314 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12580790833 0.0653680567796 192% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.