Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
The issue provides two different methods of teaching moral studies and also gives the task of choosing which one is the best method between teaching morality should be the foundation of education and teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. For producing a moral society I believe logical reasoning ability of students would serve in a better way than teaching morality as a foundation of education. For this reason, I agree with the second assumption fully. Moreover, there are three major points play a vital role in making this choice.
Firstly, If a student gets the proper teaching of logical reasoning, he/she will always be able to make difference between right wrong, true-false and honesty dishonesty. So that, that particular student will be able to produce a moral society by using his knowledge and logical reasoning power.
Secondly, If teaching morality becomes the foundation of education, students will be deprived of many other aspects and sectors of education. Moreover, moral education can not solely fulfill every aspect of education. Because education is not only dealing with moral issues but also it has some other important objectives too. The moral study only cannot produce a proper student.
Thirdly, with the help of logical reasoning ability, a student can make himself a better human being and a better social citizen which will help in developing a moral society greatly. for this reason, the foundation of the education system should be the teaching of logical reasoning. For example, if a student gets something new and if he does not have logical reasoning power, he can judge it with the help of moral study.
Teaching morality is always necessary and there is no dispute on that. And, for building a moral society moral teaching is mandatory but it cannot be the foundation of education by any means.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | abhbat | 50 | view |
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 50
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... in developing a moral society greatly. for this reason, the foundation of the educ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08709677419 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62498401957 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490322580645 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9963983556 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42654946352 0.243740707755 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154991651357 0.0831039109588 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11981503765 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251095314489 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113496717552 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.