Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented
In the era of globalization, some people support the pursuit of an ideal goal, while others claim that a goal should be reached through mutual agreement. The following essay will argue that people should work towards an ideal goal.
Admittedly, the opposing view that maintaining a goal through cooperation and consensus is essential might hold true under certain circumstances. This is because a political agreement is necessary to resolve international conflicts. Take the Cuban missiles, for example. John F. Kennedy rallied the United States because the Soviet Union implemented missiles in Cubs, which could potentially threaten America. Even though Kennedy could carry out the one-sided attack on the Soviet Union and try to reach an impossible and ideal goal, he made extraordinary efforts to negotiate with Nikita Khrushcveh to find common ground Khrushcveh agreed to remove Cuban missiles in exchange for the U.S. promising not to invade Cuba. By reaching a consensus, the U.S. could maintain amicable international relations. Accordingly, based on the above example, it is plausible to state that finding common ground is a vital factor in politics.
However, in most cases, the goal of pursuit should be ideal. This is because being realistic is ineffective, and political leaders must be idealistic to achieve significant accomplishments. The women’s right movements is a compelling instance. In the past, when the concept of “glass-celling” was prevalent, women did not have equal rights as men had. In particular, women were not eligible to vote. Compared to men, women also could not have equal opportunities to get educated or promoted to higher positions. Susan B. Anthony, a prominent American civil rights leader, strived to offer the right to vote to women. She could not realize suffrage for women in her life, but her efforts were significantly responsible for women’s enfranchisement. Although many people considered her goal unrealistic, her idealized goal made it possible for women to achieve freedom much later in the course of history. As seen in this example, idealization is pivotal in achieving political goals.
Furthermore, examining political figures shows why the claim that idealized notion overrides reaching an agreement. Especially, presidents should adhere to idealized objectives. For instance, Abraham Lincoln led the United States to an equal society by achieving his ideal goal. The U.S. was divided into the Confederate and the Union during the 1800s. The Confederate agreed with the ownership of slaves, while the Union was strongly opposed to the property of slavery. Despite fierce criticism from the Confederates, Lincoln did not settle for common ground. He issued the Emancipation Proclamation to abolish slavery and eliminate discrimination in the U.S. Abolishing slavery could be seen as a far-fetched ideal notion. Still, he did not give up on fighting for such elusive ideas. Eventually, due to Lincoln’s pursuit of an ideal, slaves gained fundamental rights, and America could become a more egalitarian society. Hence, it is somewhat credible to state that one needs to maintain their ideal goals in the political field.
In conclusion, all things considered, although making harmony is imperative, pursuing an ideal is more important in politics. Walt Disney once stated, “All our dreams can come true if we have the courage to pursue them.”
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | ljh5034 | 62 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | Ashritha Gumudavally | 50 | view |
| 2021-03-16 | RzRizvi | 50 | view |
| 2021-01-14 | tengriqagan | 83 | view |
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty Writ 79
- 10 Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 83
- Argue 70 The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large highly diversified company Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions The buildings were erected by different const 69
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 75
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rights'' or 'right's'?
Suggestion: rights'; right's
... B. Anthony, a prominent American civil rights leader, strived to offer the right to v...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2895.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46226415094 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02818667858 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 300.0 215.323595506 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 908.1 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4752759912 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3870967742 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0967741935 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.67741935484 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324093668072 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070653152334 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867293259228 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18538342336 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121062325131 0.0667264976115 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rights'' or 'right's'?
Suggestion: rights'; right's
... B. Anthony, a prominent American civil rights leader, strived to offer the right to v...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2895.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46226415094 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02818667858 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 300.0 215.323595506 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 908.1 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4752759912 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3870967742 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0967741935 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.67741935484 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324093668072 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070653152334 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867293259228 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18538342336 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121062325131 0.0667264976115 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.