Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Education is the most essential component for the growth of future. The prompt recommends that students when having a doubt or didn’t understand a particular concept, they should ask doubt rather than accepting it blindly. In my opinion, I completely agree with the suggestion and argue that student must be flexible enough to discuss with their tutors.
To begin, nowadays the curriculum of many subjects has changed and most of them are complex. Subjects are dealing with the present technologies hence student must ask a doubt to the professor when he or she has not understood a particular topic so that student can learn about it. For example, if a student has not understood a topic but he just by hearted it and if the same question was asked him in his interview, he might not answer because he just read the topic but didn’t understand it. The above example states that student should clarify the doubts on the topic otherwise it will be a disadvantage for himself.
Further, students should be given freedom to discuss with their professors. Most of the tutors are so strict that student gets scared to approach them. Most of the students are naïve and they don’t want to get into trouble or they don’t want to get scolded. However, it is the teacher’s responsibility to make the students comfortable with them so that every individual can approach the teacher to clarify their doubts.
There are students on whom teachers have a bad opinion on. This lowers the confidence of the student. Student if has any doubt won’t ask to the teacher because he don’t want to exacerbate the situation. But every student must understand that it is their duty to get it clarified as no tutor can read the minds of their students. However, there are few mischievous students who just ask doubts to waste the time of the teachers. These types of doubts can be neglected as it is reducing the efficiency of the class. But he doubts which were asked for the intention of clarifying it and learning it should be appreciated and cleared within time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | atharva1996 | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | ifxcuo | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | scremer | 100 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | anandpitale | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | nikkk | 66 | view |
- Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 50
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnersh 29
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 50
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for t 50
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91525423729 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.742041665 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483050847458 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0508971424 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05555555556 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133660423777 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488227102301 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333705150391 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955403581629 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260330559705 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.