Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
A student’s career is dependent on how well his or her teacher taught him. The prompt states that the salary of the teacher should be based on the student’s academic performance. In my opinion I agree with the suggestion and argue that the better the teaching and results, better the salary.
To begin, a student can do better in his exams only when he understands the concept. If the concept is not well taught by the tutors then it is the teacher’s mistake rather than the student’s. Because teacher’s primary job is to make their students understand and assess it. For instance, if a student is not good in mathematics his or her teacher should make the student understand them in an innovative way, In this way this makes the student to have interest in a particular subject. The above example states that every student can learn but it is the teacher’s way of teaching that helps the student to gain higher marks.
Further, a tutor should give homework, assignments and if needed projects. This makes the student to work on. Once a student starts working on a specific topic this leads to the birth of doubts. Hence, a student approaches his or her tutor for clarification. And again it is the teacher’s duty to clarify the doubt. For instance, if a student gets a doubt on math, tutor should clarify rather than neglecting it. If there is a doubt on student’s mind that means he or she is working on it.
The knowledge of a particular subject depends on how well the subject is taught by the tutor. If the tutor is teaching in a friendly way then the student will be automatically interested in the subject. However, if the teacher is arrogant and is teaching with a harsh tone, this makes the student uncomfortable which leads to the lack of concentration. So the results of the student can be directly proportional to the teacher’s hard work.
However, there are few students who actually don’t understand even though how good the teacher teaches. These students must be neglected from the results as it redues the rating of the teacher’s reputation. Thus, students from one class should be compared to other class so that teacher’s capabilities can be evaluated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | adamvg | 75 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | krishnaprasad7 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | Pushkar A Pandit | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | alia123456 | 62 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | evanlu | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in an e-mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville."Over the past ten years, there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre pr 16
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnersh 29
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for t 50
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 50
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's rec 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an innovative way" with adverb for "innovative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...should make the student understand them in an innovative way, In this way this makes the student to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cts. This makes the student to work on. Once a student starts working on a specific ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duty to clarify the doubt. For instance, if a student gets a doubt on math, tutor...
^^
Line 13, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ell the subject is taught by the tutor. If the tutor is teaching in a friendly way...
^^
Line 13, column 120, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a friendly way" with adverb for "friendly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... by the tutor. If the tutor is teaching in a friendly way then the student will be automatically ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9419525066 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06500241536 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451187335092 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0990628775 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.1363636364 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2272727273 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0948553936084 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389912487161 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395421936234 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737371220877 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322061470217 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.