Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
Student must have an open mind for imbibing skills and knowledge from teachers.The fundamental principle of developing eminent knowledge is being curious about every aspect of life. Being habitually asserting to ask questions can lead to erudite knowledge of student.
First of all, in this competitive world, every student is focusing on education as their first ladder to success. Making use of time is essential nowadays. Students who take extra classes and efforts are of no use if they are mugging all their subjects without understanding them. Even if they don’t flunk any subject and achieve moderate grades, it won’t of use. Amenably believing whatever teachers assert will eventually hinder mental capacity of students.
Second of all, burgeoning of curiosity of student may lead to some great inventions. For example, Thomas Edison who was prolific in questioning his own failures more than 100 times. At last his invention of light bulb is still recognized as erudite invention. Making such great accomplishments by not giving up and forcing to answer those questions was his motive.
However, there are few topics which have to be memorize. There aren’t ant excuses to ignore facts. For example, historian names and dates of few events must be memorized. World war 1 was fought before 1920 is one fact that cannot be questioned by students. Cold war between Russia and USA was held after world war 2. Hence, students cannot question about some historical events which are officially veracious.
In conclusion, some subjects cannot be replaced and questioned by students. However, being attentive to every detail and finding out some unanswered questions can lead to more eminent and prolific education.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-10-02 | srilakshmip05 | 66 | view |
- the first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 58
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of an action are more important than the inten 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 75
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 58
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...bing skills and knowledge from teachers.The fundamental principle of developing emi...
^^^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n lead to erudite knowledge of student. First of all, in this competitive world,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'answering'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: answering
...plishments by not giving up and forcing to answer those questions was his motive. Howeve...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, still, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 274.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30291970803 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72160261322 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642335766423 0.4932671777 130% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0233640468 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.4736842105 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4210526316 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126492525797 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381617993503 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354614227522 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068981669596 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00916969722078 0.0667264976115 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.