As we all have grown up we have all found studying to be one of the most daunting tasks. Naturally, children are motivated at different levels and take different approaches to studies. While some children take an active interest and are inquisitive about their studies, others just mug up whatever is being taught and vomit it out in the examinations. Finally, these approaches yield different results as one might expect, the children who take up an inquisitive approach get better grades on the other hand students who just mug up don't perform well in academics. The prompt here recommends that students take up an inquisitive attitude towards studies rather than just accepting whatever subject matter is being taught. Undoubtedly, the recommendation suggested by the prompt is justified for the reasons that are as detailed below.
To begin with, when children take an active interest in studies and question the subject matter that is being taught they can create much clearer concepts that they can also apply to the real world. On the other hand, when they just passively accept whatever is being taught to them no concept is made by the students and they lack clarity and they find themselves unable to apply this knowledge. Additionally, children who rely on clearer concepts can retain their subject matter for longer while those who just mug it up find it hard to retain knowledge after a while. In a recent survey conducted by the Miranda institute, the same was corroborated which was conducted or a large batch size of 5000 students. For the students who admitted that they had always been inquisitive in studies, it was found that almost 90% of them could apply their knowledge and provide examples and were also able to remember concepts that were part of courses they had taken up in earlier classes, clearly signaling towards better retention and practical knowledge of the subject matter.
Secondly, as children are inquisitive they have more interest in studies and can grasp subject matter easily. Naturally, a better academic performance these students follow while those students who don't take active interest are less inclined to study and don't perform well in academics. In the same survey conducted by Miranda Institute, it was also found that students who had admitted to taking an active interest in studies performed well in studies on average with an average score of 90% while those who had insisted that they did not take active interest on an average scored just 70%. There was a difference of 20% in total score between the two types of students signaling to us that an inquisitive approach is better.
Thirdly, it is quite clear that motivated students do not suffer from the same boredom while studying as those who are not motivated and rely on just passive acceptance of subject matter. Since motivated children don't get bored they are free from any sort of frustration or psychological depression that other students might suffer from. This is corroborated by the same study by Miranda where students who had admitted to taking an active interest in studies complained less about having to suffer from frustration or occasional depression.
In conclusion, we can say that having an inquisitive approach not only saves us from boredom and allow us to perform well but also helps in creating lifelong concepts.
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the exte 66
- 23 Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 83
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries 66
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing a 58
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As we all have grown up we have all found ...
^^
Line 1, column 534, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the other hand students who just mug up dont perform well in academics. The prompt h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tudents follow while those students who dont take active interest are less inclined ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...interest are less inclined to study and dont perform well in academics. In the same...
^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...bject matter. Since motivated children dont get bored they are free from any sort o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, in conclusion, of course, sort of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2804.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 556.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04316546763 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62043878887 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.406474820144 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 873.0 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.9671982011 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.578947368 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2631578947 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47368421053 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137069763251 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519736978515 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322839492885 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780863277171 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366488551481 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.