The prompt brings forth the point of contention between advocates and critics of the government funding of arts. While the proponents suggest that government funding is integral for arts to survive and to ensure that they can be brought in reach of many, the opponents claim that government funding attaches strings to artists by limiting what they can and cannot produce. Undoubtedly, government funding is a key lifeline for arts to thrive. It is not a hidden fact that most artists have to face a lot of financial struggles in their career and many of them leave the art world under pressure of financial burden. Government funding hence becomes necessary for the arts to survive. While the argument that government funding enforces restrictions on artists seems convincing at first, the same is easily refuted on further inquiry.
Most amateur artists and even seasoned experts face a lot of financial difficulties in their careers. While it becomes hard for amateur artists to sell their creations as their names are not well known in the art world, the more seasoned experts find it hard to come across new ideas regularly and making new art becomes a painfully long process. Thus, in either case an artist is bound to face financial woes. On top of this already bad situation an economic downturn collapses the demand for art in the market, as a result many artists are forced to take up other jobs to survive. As it becomes clear the life of an artist is full of vicissitudes and sometimes if an artform falls out of favor of public it may quickly vanish from the artworld as well. Hence, it becomes necessary for government to step in with funding and provide economic stability to artists and ensure that certain artforms don't go out of existence. The high cost of such an initiative becomes a point of concern for many, however the cost can be off set as government can engage in buying and selling of art, a very lucrative business. Apart from this, government owned art can be put up on exhibition even in remote cities, effectively bringing art galleries out of major metro cities making art more accessible to all.
As mentioned earlier, government funding comes with strings attached. Politicians and bureaucrats can influence what an artist can and cannot produce. However, such a view is fundamentally flawed fails to account that an artist can pursue multiple portfolio's one collection focused on getting grants and the other focused on his own artistic expression. Even in past many famous artists like Michael Angelo used to take up projects with the church for their bread and butter and pursued their interests as well. Such an approach not only allowed artists to survive but also they became more independent to pursue their artistic interests. It was only through regular stipend from church that Michael Angelo was able to create Mona Lisa as he had little to worry about financial woes and he could freely pursue his artistic vision.
To conclude, it is without a doubt that government funding of arts is very significant for the survival of arts. Even though it might come with certain strings attached it does not stop an artist from commissioning other work that reflects his artistic vision without the fear of pecuniary matters.
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the exte 66
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 66
- Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless they in fact prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 83
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 83
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 649, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...burden. Government funding hence becomes necessary for the arts to survive. While...
^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fully long process. Thus, in either case an artist is bound to face financial woe...
^^
Line 3, column 899, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rtists and ensure that certain artforms dont go out of existence. The high cost of s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt owned art can be put up on exhibition even in remote cities, effectively bring...
^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y significant for the survival of arts. Even though it might come with certain strings atta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, apart from, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2719.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 552.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92572463768 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84713113593 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57633855454 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48731884058 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 841.5 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7577404477 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.590909091 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268046151806 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103156534707 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102717844457 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18674599409 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113400210439 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.