Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning."
Success is subjective; it is different for different people. And hence there can be various approach of accomplishing it. For example, if creating huge amount of money is success for you then you have to take risk. Because it is difficult to generate that kind of money without taking risk. By risk i mean calculated one.
On the other hand, take another approach i.e. planning. Planning suites certain kind of goals; goals that require perseverance. For example: For someone success is to achieve some objective; say becoming an IAS officer or to serve his country. These goals require hard work and persistence. And you need proper planning to execute these goals. Mere erratic decisions or say calculated risk won't do the work here.
As of now I have discussed the approach that were working independently. However, there are some instances where you need both planning and risk taking. Consider a situation where an employee is stuck with a monotonous Job which he doesn’t like. He wants to follow his passion which is photography. But he is unsure of his decision; as he is not sure whether he will be able to make large money that he is making in his current job. However, he will be much happier following his passion. For him pursuing his passing defines success. Having done all the planning, he still requires leaf of faith.
So, through above situations I want to convey that approach for success depends upon how you define success; it is not hard coded. Sometimes two approach are mutually exclusive, while sometimes you need both.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-13 | mbajaj | 50 | view |
| 2016-08-30 | harshgrovr | 16 | view |
| 2016-08-30 | harshgrovr | 16 | view |
- "It is dangerous to trust only intelligence." 60
- Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning." 16
- People are too quick to take action; instead they should stop to think of the possible consequences of what they might do." 50
- "Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places." 70
- It is possible to pass laws that control or place limits on people s behavior but legislation cannot reform human nature Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts and minds 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ess for you then you have to take risk. Because it is difficult to generate that kind o...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...d of money without taking risk. By risk i mean calculated one. On the other ha...
^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that require perseverance. For example: For someone success is to achieve some o...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... calculated risk wont do the work here. As of now I have discussed the approach ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'while', 'for example', 'i mean', 'kind of', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.211920529801 0.240241500013 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.198675496689 0.157235817809 126% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0695364238411 0.0880659088768 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0496688741722 0.0497285424764 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0894039735099 0.0444667217837 201% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.102649006623 0.12292977631 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0496688741722 0.0406280797675 122% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64743653012 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0264900662252 0.030933414821 86% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0562913907285 0.0997080785238 56% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00993377483444 0.0249443105267 40% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0198675496689 0.0148568991511 134% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1568.0 2732.02544248 57% => OK
No of words: 263.0 452.878318584 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96197718631 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.58838876751 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.346007604563 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.292775665399 0.280924506359 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.190114068441 0.200843997647 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0988593155894 0.132149295362 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64743653012 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 219.290929204 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61216730038 0.48968727796 125% => OK
Word variations: 66.0151944419 55.4138127331 119% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 11.9545454545 23.380412469 51% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8368843786 59.4972553346 50% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2727272727 141.124799967 51% => OK
Words per sentence: 11.9545454545 23.380412469 51% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.545454545455 0.674092028746 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 41.2321119945 51.4728631049 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.07843137255 1.64882698954 65% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11577777691 0.391690518653 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0959537091379 0.123202303941 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.112946295992 0.077325440228 146% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.409115694642 0.547984918172 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155410389373 0.149214159877 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438630416838 0.161403998019 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355193369827 0.0892212321368 40% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.168740242261 0.385218514788 44% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0360981278541 0.0692045440612 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733392624349 0.275328986314 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246455536525 0.0653680567796 38% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.